2023-05-06, 10:26 AM
If you had a possibly serious illness, would you go to a "medical medium" or to a qualified medical practitioner? Or to put it another way, how certain are you really, when it comes to the crunch, in the existence of psi?
(2023-05-06, 10:26 AM)Brian Wrote: [ -> ]If you had a possibly serious illness, would you go to a "medical medium" or to a qualified medical practitioner? Or to put it another way, how certain are you really, when it comes to the crunch, in the existence of psi?
(2023-05-06, 10:26 AM)Brian Wrote: [ -> ]If you had a possibly serious illness, would you go to a "medical medium" or to a qualified medical practitioner? Or to put it another way, how certain are you really, when it comes to the crunch, in the existence of psi?
(2023-05-06, 04:07 PM)Larry Wrote: [ -> ]I'm confident enough to go to both. Why is it one or the other. "complimentary medicine"
(2023-05-06, 04:51 PM)Ninshub Wrote: [ -> ]Btw, wasn't Jesus a medical medium (maybe the greatest of them all)? (And didn't he perform "magic"?)You think the Word of God made flesh requires occult abilities in order to do miracles? No, he didn't do magic, he was the Son of God. Cancelled in this respect simply means not supported, so yes he should be cancelled because people are dying because of his "spiritual" diagnoses.
Does that mean he should be "cancelled" (whatever that means)?
(2023-05-06, 04:12 PM)nbtruthman Wrote: [ -> ]When it comes to External Qigong (EQ) healing, which appears to have a major component of paranormal effects, since there exist a lot of researched successful results and data (detailed in another thread), I would go to a good EQ healer, but only after having poor or no results from conventional medicine (which happens all too often). Not so for mediumistic healing treatments, which I consider primarily unverified.
However, this thread seems to be trying to discredit psi, esp and the paranormal in general (despite a mountain of empirical and researched evidence), based on the inevitable existence of a lot of dodgy pseudo mediumistic practitioners.
(2023-05-06, 04:07 PM)Larry Wrote: [ -> ]I'm confident enough to go to both. Why is it one or the other. "complimentary medicine"
(2023-05-07, 08:51 AM)David001 Wrote: [ -> ]Just one of the problems with conventional medicine is that it is heavily dependent on Big Pharma, which is basically only interested in making money. Does maximising money produce optimal health - I don't think so.
David
Quote:Pharma is full of good people, doing good work – and having an effect on people’s lives that the majority of academics can only dream of.https://www.theguardian.com/science/occa...l-academia
Isn’t it about time we all recognised this?