2021-11-05, 10:53 PM
(2021-11-05, 07:23 AM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: [ -> ]I do wonder what the Buddha actually thought about this "illusion of self", or even his early disciples.
People cite debates between the Buddhists and Hindus on whether there was some imperishable self (Atman), but both Buddhists and Jains joined the Hindus in arguing against the ancient materialists who denied reincarnation - or any other kind of afterlife - altogether...
I know very little about comparative religion but I have assumed that talk of illusion was in reference to the illusion of separation. In your terms, the illusion of separation between Brahman and Atman. Nevertheless, in my personal philosophy the separation, while ultimately illusory, is nevertheless essential to create the kind of distributed consciousness with feedback through which Brahman (or God, whatever you prefer) can experience and evolve.
Non-dualists like Rupert Spira seem to insist (as I understand them) that the illusion is dispensed with at (or shortly after) the moment of human death. I am fairly convinced that they are wrong and that the individual personality endures and perhaps becomes aware that it is part of a collective which is also, in turn, part of a grater collective and so on.
[EDIT] Just mulling this over in my mind, I am reminded of accounts that I have read which describe many differing realities, few of which are physical as we know it. So if most of the conscious entities which exist are from non-physical realities and presumably don't die as we do, then the Spira notion of being returned to the universal ocean of consciousness upon physical death does not apply. And if the response to that observation is that conscious entities can exist in a non-physical reality, isn't that precisely what the after-death spirit form would be?
I hope that makes sense.