(2022-09-06, 05:46 PM)Brian Wrote: You spoke about natural pathways into psi. One thing that happens with science is that new ideas get laughed at and silenced for a number of years and then somebody else picks them up again and takes the credit for them as they get treated seriously. My thinking here is Lyall Watson's "Supernature"
Regarding picking up older research and revitalizing, I have seen this happen for many reasons, but one of them is usually that the "new" scientist has a better standing, or is respected, or has better publishers, etc.
The popularity game, which shouldn't define science, but it does. Politics are bad.
Time is another factor, since I have seen a lot of skeptics back off when other evidence or research surfaces that supports the original conclusions. I love to call that eating crow, which also shows that science is very slanted, pig-headed stubborn, and brainwashed into mainstream regurgitation only. These types just need to step down.
I do like the high standards, if they were applied correctly. I don't like the lack of funding or lack of follow-up research.
Here we are begging for funding and I read that "science" discovers that female dolphins have a clitoris.... so there's money for that? And why did we need to know that?