2022-04-29, 02:52 PM
I see that there is on-going action in the memes about Psi. Action that will up the level of acceptance in the research and general public cultures. It was always going to happen, because the phenomena are there to be documented.
Maybe I'm too happy?
I am a retired sales and marketing exec, so I look curiously at the overall expression of public sentiment and how it evolves. Decades ago I was interested in the debate about evolution and the inheritability of purposeful behavior. Lamarck was - at the time - a failed theorist in a Darwinian landscape.
Just the few decades later, data patterns have proved Lamarckian pathways, and while subtle, they have major roles in current inheritance models. When I read Darwin, he believed in Lamarckian pathways and in mental evolution. Not what is reported as "Darwinism" by mass-media academic mouthpieces. The flavor of that selfish-gene talk is even changing now, as the computational battle about it is over.
Is the same arc of discovery emerging now with Psi? Science is hard at work understanding, technically, how living things understand and envision anything at all? This will lead to a natural face to Psi (in my humble opinion). Natural pathways in no way exclude a spiritual side to Psi, but does limit arguments to science data. Personally, the actualization of Psi events only legitimizes potential deeper spiritual meaning.
Is the paradigm ripe for change? The underlying arguments against Psi are falling away to shrill declarations.
What does Psiencequest tribe think???????
Maybe I'm too happy?
I am a retired sales and marketing exec, so I look curiously at the overall expression of public sentiment and how it evolves. Decades ago I was interested in the debate about evolution and the inheritability of purposeful behavior. Lamarck was - at the time - a failed theorist in a Darwinian landscape.
Just the few decades later, data patterns have proved Lamarckian pathways, and while subtle, they have major roles in current inheritance models. When I read Darwin, he believed in Lamarckian pathways and in mental evolution. Not what is reported as "Darwinism" by mass-media academic mouthpieces. The flavor of that selfish-gene talk is even changing now, as the computational battle about it is over.
Is the same arc of discovery emerging now with Psi? Science is hard at work understanding, technically, how living things understand and envision anything at all? This will lead to a natural face to Psi (in my humble opinion). Natural pathways in no way exclude a spiritual side to Psi, but does limit arguments to science data. Personally, the actualization of Psi events only legitimizes potential deeper spiritual meaning.
Is the paradigm ripe for change? The underlying arguments against Psi are falling away to shrill declarations.
What does Psiencequest tribe think???????