As you know, "The Third Way" in evolution comes up in various discussions, such as our discussion of the professor.
I have found it hard to really explore this subject, partly because the books published by this group are fairly expensive. However, now ChatGPT can access the current internet (much as we do), so I chose a book "Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned" by Axel Lange and pushed ChatGPT to discuss my doubts! This was my conversation with ChatGPT:
You said:
Can you give me synopsis of the book "Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned"
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
"Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned" by Axel Lange explores the ongoing evolution of evolutionary theory itself. While acknowledging the success of the traditional synthetic theory rooted in Darwin's work, Lange highlights its limitations in explaining certain phenomena, such as non-genetic inheritance, the emergence of complex traits like bird feathers and turtle shells, and the dynamic interactions between organisms and their environments.
Routledge
Lange advocates for the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), a framework that integrates recent scientific findings to address these gaps. Key concepts of the EES discussed in the book include:
Inclusive inheritance: Recognizing that inheritance encompasses not only genetic information but also epigenetic marks, learned behaviors, and cultural practices.
Developmental plasticity: Emphasizing organisms' ability to adapt their development in response to environmental cues, leading to heritable phenotypic variations.
Niche construction: Highlighting how organisms actively modify their environments, creating feedback loops that influence evolutionary trajectories.
Multilevel selection: Considering that selection operates at various levels, from genes and individuals to groups and ecosystems.
The book also features interviews with leading evolutionary biologists and presents case studies demonstrating the application of EES concepts. For instance, it discusses the evolution of cooperation in bacteria and the role of developmental plasticity in plant adaptation to different climates.
Move to the EES
Lange concludes by suggesting future research directions and emphasizing the need for continued dialogue and collaboration across biological disciplines. He envisions the EES not only enriching our understanding of evolution but also guiding efforts in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management in a rapidly changing world.
Move to the EES
You said:
As I understand it epigenetic marks are temporary - they cannot be inherited long term - does Lange discuss this?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Yes, the transient nature of epigenetic marks and their role in inheritance is a key point of discussion in the context of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), and Lange addresses this complexity in Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned.
Lange acknowledges the common critique that many epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are often reset during the germline development of many organisms. However, he highlights two important considerations:
Epigenetic Inheritance Across Generations: While many epigenetic changes are temporary, some can persist across multiple generations under certain conditions. Lange explores evidence from studies in plants, animals, and even humans showing that specific epigenetic marks can be transmitted through germ cells, influencing offspring phenotype without alterations to the DNA sequence. For example, research on stress, diet, and environmental exposure demonstrates that these factors can leave epigenetic "footprints" that impact descendants for a limited number of generations.
Evolutionary Significance of Temporary Epigenetic Changes: Lange argues that even transient epigenetic marks can have evolutionary implications. These changes allow organisms to respond flexibly to environmental challenges in the short term, potentially stabilizing populations or providing a survival advantage. If these changes align with genetic mutations over time, they may become permanently integrated into the genome—a process called genetic assimilation.
Interaction with Other Mechanisms: The book situates epigenetic inheritance within a broader framework that includes genetic, developmental, and ecological interactions. For instance, epigenetic changes might influence niche construction or developmental plasticity, which in turn feed back into evolutionary dynamics.
Lange emphasizes that while epigenetic inheritance may not always contribute to long-term evolutionary change, its potential to generate heritable variation in the short term is significant. It also challenges the gene-centric view of inheritance, broadening our understanding of how traits and adaptations emerge.
By discussing these nuances, Lange supports the idea that epigenetics is an important component of the EES, even if its role is more transient or context-dependent compared to genetic inheritance.
You said:
You write "Lange emphasizes that while epigenetic inheritance may not always contribute to long-term evolutionary change, its potential to generate heritable variation in the short term is significant." I wonder if you can explain how that would work in detail with an example. I am extremely skeptical that epigenetics can contribute to long term evolution.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Your skepticism is well-founded, as the debate over whether epigenetic changes contribute to long-term evolution is a nuanced and ongoing one. I’ll explain how epigenetic inheritance could contribute to heritable variation and even influence evolutionary trajectories, using an example Lange might explore: adaptive responses in plants to environmental stress.
Example: Epigenetics in Plant Stress Response
Plants are an excellent model for exploring the evolutionary role of epigenetics because they cannot move away from environmental stressors and must adapt in situ.
Step 1: Environmental Stress Induces Epigenetic Changes
When a plant is exposed to environmental stress—such as drought or high salinity—it may activate stress-response genes via epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation or histone modifications. These changes allow the plant to alter its physiology rapidly (e.g., conserving water or altering root growth).
Step 2: Transmission to Offspring
Some of these stress-induced epigenetic marks can be passed to the next generation through seeds. For instance, studies on plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and rice have shown that epigenetic modifications related to stress tolerance can persist for one or more generations, enabling offspring to be better prepared for similar environmental challenges.
Step 3: Short-Term Evolutionary Benefits
If the environmental stress is prolonged or recurring (e.g., over several growing seasons), the offspring with inherited epigenetic adaptations may have a survival advantage compared to those without them. This transient inheritance could help stabilize a population in changing environments, allowing time for genetic mutations to arise and fix these adaptations into the genome—a process known as genetic assimilation.
Step 4: Genetic Assimilation
Once the population's survival is stabilized, mutations in the DNA sequence that mimic the beneficial effects of the epigenetic changes may become selectively advantageous. Over generations, natural selection could favor individuals with permanent genetic changes encoding the traits initially mediated by epigenetic mechanisms. At this point, the role of the original epigenetic change diminishes, but it served as a "bridge" during a period of rapid adaptation.
Why Epigenetics Alone May Not Lead to Long-Term Evolution
Your skepticism stems from the understanding that most epigenetic changes are reversible and reset during reproduction. While this is true for many organisms, some exceptions exist:
In plants, heritable epigenetic changes are more common and can persist for several generations.
In animals, cases like transgenerational effects of stress in rodents suggest epigenetic marks might occasionally escape reprogramming.
However, critics argue that these effects are too transient to significantly impact long-term evolution without being backed by genetic changes. This is why proponents of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, like Lange, view epigenetics as complementary to traditional genetic mechanisms, rather than a standalone driver of evolutionary change.
The Takeaway
Epigenetic inheritance is most influential in short-term evolutionary scenarios, particularly in rapidly changing or stressful environments. While it might not directly drive long-term evolution, it can create a window for genetic mutations to occur and stabilize adaptations over time. The interaction between epigenetic and genetic mechanisms highlights how evolution is a dynamic, multi-layered process.
Does this perspective address your concerns, or would you like me to delve deeper into specific aspects?
You said:
Step 4 is what concerns me! Bearing in mind that any mutation of the actual DNA would have no resemblance to epigenetic markers that affect the frequency of transcription of the gene in question.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
You bring up an excellent point: the idea that genetic mutations somehow "mimic" epigenetic markers is indeed a contentious and speculative aspect of the hypothesis. Let me break it down further and address your concern.
The Problem with Step 4: Genetic Mutation Mimicking Epigenetic Marks
You're absolutely correct that:
Epigenetic changes typically regulate the frequency or timing of gene expression, whereas mutations in the DNA directly alter the genetic code. These are fundamentally different mechanisms.
There is no inherent mechanism ensuring that mutations in the DNA sequence would "match" or "replace" the function of an epigenetic change. The randomness of mutation makes this connection highly unlikely without selective pressures.
This raises the key issue: how can genetic changes possibly "replace" the effects of epigenetic regulation if the two processes are so distinct?
How Genetic Assimilation Could Work in Detail
The concept of genetic assimilation, which dates back to Waddington's experiments in the 1950s, is used to describe how phenotypes initially produced through non-genetic mechanisms can become encoded genetically over time. However, the pathway to this is complex and indirect. Here's a more cautious breakdown of how this might occur:
1. Epigenetic Changes Influence Fitness
Environmental changes lead to epigenetic modifications that alter gene expression.
These modifications enable a phenotype (e.g., drought tolerance) that increases fitness.
Over generations, selection favors individuals that consistently exhibit this phenotype.
2. Mutations in the Genetic Pathway Achieve a Similar Outcome
Mutations that happen to enhance the same phenotype (e.g., increased water retention, deeper roots) are now subject to selection.
Importantly, these mutations don't need to "mimic" the epigenetic mark itself—they just need to produce the same functional outcome (e.g., stress tolerance).
3. Selection Fixes the Genetic Changes
As beneficial mutations arise, they provide a more stable mechanism for maintaining the adaptive phenotype.
Once the phenotype is encoded genetically, the role of the original epigenetic changes diminishes and may no longer be necessary.
Example: Heat Shock Proteins in Drosophila (Waddington’s Experiment)
Waddington's classic work on Drosophila serves as a possible (though still debated) illustration of this process:
He exposed flies to heat shock during development, which induced a change in wing morphology.
Over generations of artificial selection for this phenotype, the wing change became genetically encoded, even in the absence of heat shock.
The interpretation was that mutations in the genome, possibly in regulatory elements or the coding regions of heat-shock-related genes, arose and were selected for, stabilizing the phenotype.
However, the specifics of this process remain murky. Critics argue that Waddington’s work may not demonstrate true genetic assimilation but rather a selective mechanism acting on standing genetic variation.
Why the Criticism Is Valid
Unlikely Correlation: The odds that random genetic mutations align perfectly with the functional outcome of an epigenetic change are low.
Mechanistic Gaps: There’s little evidence showing how or why mutations would specifically target the same genes influenced by epigenetic markers.
Transience of Epigenetic Marks: If epigenetic changes are fleeting, there’s often not enough time for genetic mutations to occur and become fixed under selection.
A Nuanced View: Epigenetics as a "Facilitator," Not a Driver
Instead of directly leading to genetic assimilation, epigenetics might act as a facilitator by:
Buffering Populations: Epigenetic changes allow populations to survive sudden environmental stress, maintaining genetic diversity.
Altering Selection Pressures: By influencing phenotype, epigenetic changes might expose different genetic variants to selection.
This facilitation might explain short-term adaptability but does not imply a direct transition to long-term genetic change.
The Bottom Line
Your skepticism is well-founded because the mechanism tying epigenetic changes to stable genetic evolution remains speculative. While epigenetics clearly plays a role in short-term adaptation, the idea that it drives long-term evolution depends on indirect processes and is not strongly supported by empirical evidence. It’s safer to view epigenetics as a complementary mechanism, aiding populations through rapid environmental change rather than as a direct contributor to genetic evolution.
Does this align with your concerns, or is there another aspect you'd like me to clarify further?
David
I have found it hard to really explore this subject, partly because the books published by this group are fairly expensive. However, now ChatGPT can access the current internet (much as we do), so I chose a book "Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned" by Axel Lange and pushed ChatGPT to discuss my doubts! This was my conversation with ChatGPT:
You said:
Can you give me synopsis of the book "Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned"
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
"Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned" by Axel Lange explores the ongoing evolution of evolutionary theory itself. While acknowledging the success of the traditional synthetic theory rooted in Darwin's work, Lange highlights its limitations in explaining certain phenomena, such as non-genetic inheritance, the emergence of complex traits like bird feathers and turtle shells, and the dynamic interactions between organisms and their environments.
Routledge
Lange advocates for the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), a framework that integrates recent scientific findings to address these gaps. Key concepts of the EES discussed in the book include:
Inclusive inheritance: Recognizing that inheritance encompasses not only genetic information but also epigenetic marks, learned behaviors, and cultural practices.
Developmental plasticity: Emphasizing organisms' ability to adapt their development in response to environmental cues, leading to heritable phenotypic variations.
Niche construction: Highlighting how organisms actively modify their environments, creating feedback loops that influence evolutionary trajectories.
Multilevel selection: Considering that selection operates at various levels, from genes and individuals to groups and ecosystems.
The book also features interviews with leading evolutionary biologists and presents case studies demonstrating the application of EES concepts. For instance, it discusses the evolution of cooperation in bacteria and the role of developmental plasticity in plant adaptation to different climates.
Move to the EES
Lange concludes by suggesting future research directions and emphasizing the need for continued dialogue and collaboration across biological disciplines. He envisions the EES not only enriching our understanding of evolution but also guiding efforts in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management in a rapidly changing world.
Move to the EES
You said:
As I understand it epigenetic marks are temporary - they cannot be inherited long term - does Lange discuss this?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Yes, the transient nature of epigenetic marks and their role in inheritance is a key point of discussion in the context of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), and Lange addresses this complexity in Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis: Darwin’s Legacy Redesigned.
Lange acknowledges the common critique that many epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are often reset during the germline development of many organisms. However, he highlights two important considerations:
Epigenetic Inheritance Across Generations: While many epigenetic changes are temporary, some can persist across multiple generations under certain conditions. Lange explores evidence from studies in plants, animals, and even humans showing that specific epigenetic marks can be transmitted through germ cells, influencing offspring phenotype without alterations to the DNA sequence. For example, research on stress, diet, and environmental exposure demonstrates that these factors can leave epigenetic "footprints" that impact descendants for a limited number of generations.
Evolutionary Significance of Temporary Epigenetic Changes: Lange argues that even transient epigenetic marks can have evolutionary implications. These changes allow organisms to respond flexibly to environmental challenges in the short term, potentially stabilizing populations or providing a survival advantage. If these changes align with genetic mutations over time, they may become permanently integrated into the genome—a process called genetic assimilation.
Interaction with Other Mechanisms: The book situates epigenetic inheritance within a broader framework that includes genetic, developmental, and ecological interactions. For instance, epigenetic changes might influence niche construction or developmental plasticity, which in turn feed back into evolutionary dynamics.
Lange emphasizes that while epigenetic inheritance may not always contribute to long-term evolutionary change, its potential to generate heritable variation in the short term is significant. It also challenges the gene-centric view of inheritance, broadening our understanding of how traits and adaptations emerge.
By discussing these nuances, Lange supports the idea that epigenetics is an important component of the EES, even if its role is more transient or context-dependent compared to genetic inheritance.
You said:
You write "Lange emphasizes that while epigenetic inheritance may not always contribute to long-term evolutionary change, its potential to generate heritable variation in the short term is significant." I wonder if you can explain how that would work in detail with an example. I am extremely skeptical that epigenetics can contribute to long term evolution.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Your skepticism is well-founded, as the debate over whether epigenetic changes contribute to long-term evolution is a nuanced and ongoing one. I’ll explain how epigenetic inheritance could contribute to heritable variation and even influence evolutionary trajectories, using an example Lange might explore: adaptive responses in plants to environmental stress.
Example: Epigenetics in Plant Stress Response
Plants are an excellent model for exploring the evolutionary role of epigenetics because they cannot move away from environmental stressors and must adapt in situ.
Step 1: Environmental Stress Induces Epigenetic Changes
When a plant is exposed to environmental stress—such as drought or high salinity—it may activate stress-response genes via epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation or histone modifications. These changes allow the plant to alter its physiology rapidly (e.g., conserving water or altering root growth).
Step 2: Transmission to Offspring
Some of these stress-induced epigenetic marks can be passed to the next generation through seeds. For instance, studies on plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and rice have shown that epigenetic modifications related to stress tolerance can persist for one or more generations, enabling offspring to be better prepared for similar environmental challenges.
Step 3: Short-Term Evolutionary Benefits
If the environmental stress is prolonged or recurring (e.g., over several growing seasons), the offspring with inherited epigenetic adaptations may have a survival advantage compared to those without them. This transient inheritance could help stabilize a population in changing environments, allowing time for genetic mutations to arise and fix these adaptations into the genome—a process known as genetic assimilation.
Step 4: Genetic Assimilation
Once the population's survival is stabilized, mutations in the DNA sequence that mimic the beneficial effects of the epigenetic changes may become selectively advantageous. Over generations, natural selection could favor individuals with permanent genetic changes encoding the traits initially mediated by epigenetic mechanisms. At this point, the role of the original epigenetic change diminishes, but it served as a "bridge" during a period of rapid adaptation.
Why Epigenetics Alone May Not Lead to Long-Term Evolution
Your skepticism stems from the understanding that most epigenetic changes are reversible and reset during reproduction. While this is true for many organisms, some exceptions exist:
In plants, heritable epigenetic changes are more common and can persist for several generations.
In animals, cases like transgenerational effects of stress in rodents suggest epigenetic marks might occasionally escape reprogramming.
However, critics argue that these effects are too transient to significantly impact long-term evolution without being backed by genetic changes. This is why proponents of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, like Lange, view epigenetics as complementary to traditional genetic mechanisms, rather than a standalone driver of evolutionary change.
The Takeaway
Epigenetic inheritance is most influential in short-term evolutionary scenarios, particularly in rapidly changing or stressful environments. While it might not directly drive long-term evolution, it can create a window for genetic mutations to occur and stabilize adaptations over time. The interaction between epigenetic and genetic mechanisms highlights how evolution is a dynamic, multi-layered process.
Does this perspective address your concerns, or would you like me to delve deeper into specific aspects?
You said:
Step 4 is what concerns me! Bearing in mind that any mutation of the actual DNA would have no resemblance to epigenetic markers that affect the frequency of transcription of the gene in question.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
You bring up an excellent point: the idea that genetic mutations somehow "mimic" epigenetic markers is indeed a contentious and speculative aspect of the hypothesis. Let me break it down further and address your concern.
The Problem with Step 4: Genetic Mutation Mimicking Epigenetic Marks
You're absolutely correct that:
Epigenetic changes typically regulate the frequency or timing of gene expression, whereas mutations in the DNA directly alter the genetic code. These are fundamentally different mechanisms.
There is no inherent mechanism ensuring that mutations in the DNA sequence would "match" or "replace" the function of an epigenetic change. The randomness of mutation makes this connection highly unlikely without selective pressures.
This raises the key issue: how can genetic changes possibly "replace" the effects of epigenetic regulation if the two processes are so distinct?
How Genetic Assimilation Could Work in Detail
The concept of genetic assimilation, which dates back to Waddington's experiments in the 1950s, is used to describe how phenotypes initially produced through non-genetic mechanisms can become encoded genetically over time. However, the pathway to this is complex and indirect. Here's a more cautious breakdown of how this might occur:
1. Epigenetic Changes Influence Fitness
Environmental changes lead to epigenetic modifications that alter gene expression.
These modifications enable a phenotype (e.g., drought tolerance) that increases fitness.
Over generations, selection favors individuals that consistently exhibit this phenotype.
2. Mutations in the Genetic Pathway Achieve a Similar Outcome
Mutations that happen to enhance the same phenotype (e.g., increased water retention, deeper roots) are now subject to selection.
Importantly, these mutations don't need to "mimic" the epigenetic mark itself—they just need to produce the same functional outcome (e.g., stress tolerance).
3. Selection Fixes the Genetic Changes
As beneficial mutations arise, they provide a more stable mechanism for maintaining the adaptive phenotype.
Once the phenotype is encoded genetically, the role of the original epigenetic changes diminishes and may no longer be necessary.
Example: Heat Shock Proteins in Drosophila (Waddington’s Experiment)
Waddington's classic work on Drosophila serves as a possible (though still debated) illustration of this process:
He exposed flies to heat shock during development, which induced a change in wing morphology.
Over generations of artificial selection for this phenotype, the wing change became genetically encoded, even in the absence of heat shock.
The interpretation was that mutations in the genome, possibly in regulatory elements or the coding regions of heat-shock-related genes, arose and were selected for, stabilizing the phenotype.
However, the specifics of this process remain murky. Critics argue that Waddington’s work may not demonstrate true genetic assimilation but rather a selective mechanism acting on standing genetic variation.
Why the Criticism Is Valid
Unlikely Correlation: The odds that random genetic mutations align perfectly with the functional outcome of an epigenetic change are low.
Mechanistic Gaps: There’s little evidence showing how or why mutations would specifically target the same genes influenced by epigenetic markers.
Transience of Epigenetic Marks: If epigenetic changes are fleeting, there’s often not enough time for genetic mutations to occur and become fixed under selection.
A Nuanced View: Epigenetics as a "Facilitator," Not a Driver
Instead of directly leading to genetic assimilation, epigenetics might act as a facilitator by:
Buffering Populations: Epigenetic changes allow populations to survive sudden environmental stress, maintaining genetic diversity.
Altering Selection Pressures: By influencing phenotype, epigenetic changes might expose different genetic variants to selection.
This facilitation might explain short-term adaptability but does not imply a direct transition to long-term genetic change.
The Bottom Line
Your skepticism is well-founded because the mechanism tying epigenetic changes to stable genetic evolution remains speculative. While epigenetics clearly plays a role in short-term adaptation, the idea that it drives long-term evolution depends on indirect processes and is not strongly supported by empirical evidence. It’s safer to view epigenetics as a complementary mechanism, aiding populations through rapid environmental change rather than as a direct contributor to genetic evolution.
Does this align with your concerns, or is there another aspect you'd like me to clarify further?
David
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)