[Post deleted at Brian's request]
The Commercialization of Research and the Quest for the Objectivity of Science
6 Replies, 1437 Views
0
(2017-09-20, 08:23 AM)Brian Wrote: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10699-014-9377-8Interesting papers, Brian. I don't have the full paper here. I'm curious about what she means about the scientific consensus not being knowledge-based in the Bendectin case? I remember Bendectin because I was pregnant while I lived in the US and while I lived in Canada. I could only use Bendectin in Canada because of these lawsuits in the US. Linda
1
This post has been deleted.
Looks like you can get it here but you have to sign in with facebook or Google.
[/url] [url=http://huji.academia.edu/BoazMiller]http://huji.academia.edu/BoazMiller
0
https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/27595/16/Miller_Boaz_201103_PhD_thesis.pdf
In Chapter 3, I begin my positive analysis of the social conditions for knowledge. I explore the question of when a consensus is knowledge based. I argue that a consensus is knowledge based when knowledge is the best explanation of the consensus. I identify three conditions – social diversity, apparent consilience of evidence, and meta‐agreement, for knowledge being the best explanation of a consensus. In Chapter 4, I illustrate my argument by analyzing the recent controversy about the safety of the drug Bendectin. fls - I thought this might contain what you are looking for
0
Thanks Brian. It looks interesting so far, but it definitely won't be a quick read.
![]() Linda
1
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)