Please note, this thread is in the Extended Consciousness Phenomena review forum rules that apply before posting to this thread.
This post has been moved here from a different thread please disregard the x'd out text.
There is some fraud and some genuine, and some of the evidence said to prove fraud has been found to be deliberately falsified. Also some faked evidence of fraud may have not been detected as fake, so there may be some physical mediumship believed to be fraud that is actually genuine.
You should demand the same high level of proof from skeptics claiming fraud as you demand from people claiming evidence of paranormal phenomena. Sometimes people accept any accusation of fraud at face value but too often the assertions of skeptics do not hold up under close scrutiny (http://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/sk...sdirection).
This is a very good site for articles on genuine physical mediumship:
http://zerdinisworld.com/
From my own web site and blog: ...
Nobel prize winning physicist Pierre Curie studied physical mediumship and found it is real:
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/e...erre_curie
Charles Richet Nobel Prize winner in Physiology and Medicine studied physical mediumship and found the phenomena was genuine
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/e...ers_richet
William Crookes who invented the cathode ray tube studied physical mediumship and found it was real.
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2009/05/telek...-1871.html
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/p/articles-an..._ectoplasm
[Image: webber24.jpg]
[Image: webber23.jpg]
You can read about the provenance of the photos here:
more photos and provenance...
Magicians cannot reproduce the phenomena of physical mediumship and other paranormal abilities under conditions that psychics produce those phenomena.
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...cies_magic
False accusations of fraud:
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...ion_duncan
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...on_houdini
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...tion_price
This post has been moved here from a different thread please disregard the x'd out text.
There is some fraud and some genuine, and some of the evidence said to prove fraud has been found to be deliberately falsified. Also some faked evidence of fraud may have not been detected as fake, so there may be some physical mediumship believed to be fraud that is actually genuine.
You should demand the same high level of proof from skeptics claiming fraud as you demand from people claiming evidence of paranormal phenomena. Sometimes people accept any accusation of fraud at face value but too often the assertions of skeptics do not hold up under close scrutiny (http://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/sk...sdirection).
This is a very good site for articles on genuine physical mediumship:
http://zerdinisworld.com/
From my own web site and blog: ...
Nobel prize winning physicist Pierre Curie studied physical mediumship and found it is real:
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/e...erre_curie
Quote:According to the "Occultism & Parapsychology Encyclopedia"
...
On July 24, 1905, Pierre Curie reported to his friend Gouy: "We have had a series of séances with Eusapia Palladino at the [Society for Psychical Research]."
It was very interesting, and really the phenomena that we saw appeared inexplicable as trickery—tables raised from all four legs, movement of objects from a distance, hands that pinch or caress you, luminous apparitions. All in a [setting] prepared by us with a small number of spectators all known to us and without a possible accomplice. The only trick possible is that which could result from an extraordinary facility of the medium as a magician. But how do you explain the phenomena when one is holding her hands and feet and when the light is sufficient so that one can see everything that happens?[13]
http://www.answers.com/topic/eusapia-palladino
Charles Richet Nobel Prize winner in Physiology and Medicine studied physical mediumship and found the phenomena was genuine
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/e...ers_richet
Quote:However, while conducting in his own research, he observed the evidence proving what he called four fundamental facts of metapsychics: cryptesthesia (his term for the phenomena of mediumship), telekinesis, ectoplasm, and premonitions. He wrote:
Therefore:
1. There is in us a faculty of cognition that differs radically from the usual sensorial faculties (Cryptesthesia).
2. There are, even in full light, movements of objects without contact (Telekinesis).
3. Hands, bodies, and objects seem to take shape in their entirety from a cloud and take all the semblance of life (Ectoplasms).
4. There occur premonitions that can be explained neither by chance nor perspicacity, and are sometimes verified in minute detail.
Such are my firm and explicit conclusions.
William Crookes who invented the cathode ray tube studied physical mediumship and found it was real.
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2009/05/telek...-1871.html
Quote:Telekinesis Proved In 1871
William Crookes tested the psychic Daniel Dunglas Home in 1871 and proved telekinesis is real. He tested Home in laboratory conditions that prevented fraud. Crookes even jumped up and down on the apparatus to prove it couldn't be moved by Home if he tried to cheat.
Crookes' book, Researches into the Phenomena of Modern Spiritualism, has diagrams of the equipment and wind-up chart recorder graphs showing the spontaneous movements.
It even has a drawing of the cage in which the accordion was seen to be playing itself.
http://www.survivalafterdeath.info/libra...gation.htm
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/p/articles-an..._ectoplasm
Quote:Jack Webber Photos
http://www.survivalebooks.org/Webber/webberphotos.htm
[Image: webber24.jpg]
[Image: webber23.jpg]
You can read about the provenance of the photos here:
Quote:Medium Jack Webber Zerdini: "Leon Isaacs, who took the photographs at Webber’s circles, used two cameras placed at different angles…shots using this two-camera technique showed the disposition of trumpets and other objects, establishing that they were not held aloft by any material agency."
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2012/05/mediu...ebber.html
more photos and provenance...
Quote:Photos of Seances taken by Sven Türck. "The Danish psychic researcher and photographer Sven Türck took many photos of Jonsson's psychokinetic powers, protected against any form of cheating through strict controls in his laboratory."
http://mariondampier-jeans.com/%e2%97%8f...ven-turck/
English Translation http://translate.google.se/translate?sl=...ven-turck/
Photos from MarionDampeier-Jeans.com take during seances.
https://web.archive.org/web/201301170419.../pictures/
Quote:The Physical Mediumship of Einer Nielsen "This tribute comes from a pastor of the Swedish State Church ... 'Twice I have sat in the cabinet and kept hold of the medium’s hands. The ectoplasm came directly through his clothes. One figure that of Rita, rose up from the ectoplasm grasped my arm, and we went out together to the sitters and talked with them.'"
http://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/2012/12/last-...ks-to.html
Magicians cannot reproduce the phenomena of physical mediumship and other paranormal abilities under conditions that psychics produce those phenomena.
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...cies_magic
Quote:...
Will Goldston, one of Europe's leading professional magicians, author of 40 works on sleight of hand, and founder of the Magicians' Club of London, testified in a national newspaper (the Daily Sketch) that 'I am convinced that what I saw [at a Rudi Schneider séance organized by Harry Price] was not trickery. No group of my fellow- magicians could have produced those effects under such conditions.' Goldston also spoke up for independent voice medium Hazel Ridley and for Helen Duncan (who may have been another who used mixed mediumship) and was sufficiently impressed by physical phenomena actually to become a spiritualist. Both David Abbott and Howard Thurston, contemporaries of Houdini and two of America's best-known magicians, confessed their conviction in the genuineness of physical phenomena (like Goldston, Thurston also became a spiritualist).
...
Samuel Bellachini was the Court Conjuror for Emperor William I at Berlin. Bellachini investigated the controversial American medium Henry Slade. The sittings were not only held in darkness, but some were in full daylight. Bellachini was convinced that the results were not due to trickery.
The famous historical medium, Eusapia Palladino, readily admitted herself that she used trickery when she could. Skeptics have often thus dismissed positive reports of her phenomena. But no less than Howard Thurston [a well known magician] believed in some of her results and said so in the New York Times. Thurston was nevertheless well aware of her trickery.
False accusations of fraud:
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...ion_duncan
Quote:During World War II, the British medium Helen Duncan brought through the spirit of a sailor who had died when his war ship was sunk. The Admiralty had wanted to keep information about the sinking secret to protect public morale. Because of this leakage of secret information, the British government feared that spirits might also reveal the plans for the D. Day invasion of Europe through Duncan's mediumship. As a result, an employee of the Admiralty brought the police to a seance held by Duncan and she was imprisoned on trumped up charges of fraud....
As a debunking exercise the case failed miserably. Skeptics must have winced at the daily reporting of case after case where 'dead' relatives had materialised and given absolute proof of their continued existence . One Kathleen McNeill, wife of a Glaswegian forgemaster, told how she has attended such a séance at which her sister appeared. Her sister had died some a few hours previously, after an operation, and news of her death could not have been known. Yet Albert, Helen Duncan's guide, announced that she had just passed over.
...
Mary Blackwell, President of the Pathfinder Spiritualist Society of Baker Street London, testified that she had attended more than 100 materialization séances with Helen Duncan at each of which between 15 and 16 different entities from the afterlife had materialized. She testified that she had witnessed the spirit forms conversing with their relatives in French, German, Dutch, Welsh, Scottish and Arabic. She claimed that she had witnessed the manifestation of ten of her own close relatives including her husband, her mother and her father all of whom she had seen up close and touched.
...
This case was an outrageous example of a government abusing it's power, using deception to suppress mediumship. Normally, the type of complaint made against Duncan would have been treated as a minor offense. When first arrested, the police charged her with vagrancy which would have been punished with a fine of up to five shillings. However, Duncan was denied bail and the charges were changed several times by the prosecutors. They finally settled upon pretending to conjure spirits under an archaic witchcraft act which was punishable by a prison sentence. This was an unprecedented overreaction. No other medium of that era was ever treated in this way. The only explanation for this miscarriage of justice is that the government wanted Duncan held incommunicado in prison during the time leading up to the D. Day invasion of Europe to prevent spirits from accidentally leaking secret information. That Duncan was denied bail for this minor and non-violent offense is further proof of this explanation.
The case would have been handled in an entirely different manner if the government truly believed Helen Duncan was committing fraud. In that case, she would have been given a small fine and sent on her way. The only reason Helen Duncan was denied bail and sent to prison for fraud was because her mediumship was genuine.
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...on_houdini
Quote:Houdini was invited to investigate Mina Crandon; in a series of sittings he was unable to debunk her. Finally, in one sitting, just as Mina was about to start she suddenly said (while allegedly in a trance and controlled by her spirit guide Walter) that Houdini's assistant had planted a folding ruler in the cabinet that she occupied and that he meant to produce this ruler as evidence that she was cheating.
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/s...tion_price
Quote:Price was also deceptive about the evidence he used to denounce the medium Rudi Schneider. During his investigation of Schneider, Price used a system of stereo cameras with flashes to take pictures of movements made by the medium during seances. One picture, Price alleged, showed Schneider cheating during a seance. However, when viewed in stereo, the picture actually shows the medium couldn't have done what Price accused him of doing. This episode is described in full on the harryprice.co.uk web site:
The stereoscopic pictures show that Rudi would have to be an orang-utan to reach the handkerchief from the position shown, and his arm is not extended towards the table.
...
Price's whole case against Rudi rests on this one set of ambiguous photographs. The stereoscopic evidence suggests that the double exposure was an accident which Price wrongly and wrongfully exploited when it suited him.
The first gulp from the glass of science will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you - Werner Heisenberg. (More at my Blog & Website)
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-01, 08:34 AM by Jim_Smith.)