Is physical mediumship fraudulent?
158 Replies, 28443 Views
This post has been deleted.
(2017-09-04, 10:11 AM)Chris Wrote: If I remember correctly, there was a medium who claimed to be in touch with him, though I don't think it was a physical medium. Yes your memory is correct. There may have been others but Kenneth allegedly put in an appearance at least at one meeting of The Noah's Ark Society (now sadly defunct). The medium was Colin Fry. The method was the Independent Direct Voice (Physical Mediumship) and one of my closest friends was there. The difficulty is that unless there is someone there who knows the communicator personally it can difficult to validate. (2017-09-04, 04:54 AM)Ninshub Wrote: Caylor has his own sticky thread on the SpiritualismLink forum (in the phys med section). Is it true that he and Thompson "don't respond appropriately to questions about their mediumship", and if so why? I've got no bone to pick here with anybody, just curious. From a cursory look, all I can see is these 3 PMs are very controversial, and from reading the SL forum you'd come away thinking you'd be best be wary of them. I'm not saying I therefore believe this - I just see this is a whole world unto itself, and I admire those like Pssst who attend (many, many) séances and do their own observations. At the same time, I can't ignore those, who, like on that forum, seem to have knowledge about the history and practice of mediumship and physical mediumship, who bemoan current trends. I'm left feeling how very small my knowledge is of this field, and how I wish it would be bigger. The inhabitants of SpritualismLink are, for the most part, fundamentalist-Spiritualists (Modern Spiritualists aka), they have long ago decided what is "proper" mediumship and what is not. They represent one end of the PM spectrum, I and the large majority of actual PM attendees represent the other. So my advice would be to stand in a neutral space in between, and make your own decisions. And go to seance and find out for yourself. All of the PMs demonstrating today are very open to any questions whatsoever about their mediumship in person. If you get to know them, they respond to email and txt and to incoming phone calls. They just don't agree with the fundamentalists and have zero intention of paying any attention to their input (judgments). (2017-09-04, 10:25 AM)jkmac Wrote: This is pitiful and it is exactly what reasonable people think is going on. Yes, it is "no wonder the vast majority of people think this is bullshit" primarily because the vast majority of ppl are 15 sound bytes intelligent about this matter. As to pressing on their legitimacy, what exactly would legitimate entail? It's a moving target and as they found out with the Braude-Wolf debacle. Why satisfy the judgments of ppl who know little to nothing with the phenomenon? Not observations, straight-fwd judgments. Sway them, hell, I am the one who advised all of them to forego any scientific or other so-called 'investigations'. I drew up a set of 'rules' for investigation that Braude refused to work under, e was wanting to "have another go" w/out The Wolf. Too bad, you blew it, Stepehen, you're out. So whose going to do this investigation anyway that has the credentials to pull one off? They're nowhere to be found, the interest in PM is null to void. (2017-09-04, 04:23 PM)Pssst Wrote: Yes, it is "no wonder the vast majority of people think this is bullshit" primarily because the vast majority of ppl are 15 sound bytes intelligent about this matter. I get what you are saying. But just to be clear on this- I am in no way suggesting someone attempt a full and complete analysis of this, with the objective to nail it to the wall. There are many reasons why this would not be fruitful and would not be worth the trouble. However, I AM suggesting that something like a simple low light camera showing whether someone is walking around the room with a trumpet, or has removed the bindings on their wrists, or is stuffing something in their mouth, would be very useful, and it would demonstrate an honest attempt at transparency (pun sort of intended). As I said earlier- they are taking great pains to show everyone that they are bound. Why would they do this? Answer- To show the audience that they are not trying to fool them right? Well if they were to place a $75 battery powered camera at an angle to show them while they sit behind the curtain gathering their thoughts, they could easily dispel those criticisms. My feeling is: the (totally valid) fact that they can never prove themselves to everybody, is a poor excuse for not taking at least the simple steps to satisfy most people. They realize this, or they wouldn't tape their mouths and bind their wrists. Here's the bottom line for me: when my parents, and later in life my religious friends, told me that there was no proof of God's existence, and that proof wasn't possible, and that I need to just "have faith", I thought about it, and lovingly told them all to shove it. I decided I would not accept something as incredible as what they were saying without some evidence. And I'm glad I stuck to my principles, because I am here today with the understanding I have, by virtue of that mindset. I would call it: being open minded with discernment. I think the obvious question that people have with PMs is: what is that guy doing behind the curtain and/or in the dark? This could be easily answered, by one or two simple steps: if only just to show good faith. I'm not looking for anything extraordinary, just minimal steps to establish trust. Heck- I'll buy the camera and donate it to the cause.. (2017-09-04, 05:03 PM)jkmac Wrote: I get what you are saying. Spirit controls when recordings are made, photo or video is shot. The medium has no issue with allowing spirit this responsibility, who would better know what is dangerous and what is not? Remember, and this fact gets lost very quickly, people, including sitters, can be irreparably harmed or killed DEAD. I mean are you willing to be the one who calls Emergency Services and explain how the dead medium was killed because of a sitter's unwillingness to play by the rules or there is a foul-up unforeseen (spirit is far from perfect)? We have a regular sitter who is also the Head of Detectives, when we caught a sitter trying to sneak in a small recorder unauthorized, we expelled the sitter and he wanted to press charges for malicious mischief...at the least. Too much is at stake, when or if spirit decides to open up for more thorough investigation, then and only then will there be that investigation and until then, no chance. We have access to all of the most advanced low light, night vision and infrared technologies from the equipment coffers of the intelligence community. Let me say it this way, there is no chance they will be let into a modern PM seance room but they sure would like to know how to create ectoplasm. (2017-09-04, 05:22 PM)Pssst Wrote: Spirit controls when recordings are made, photo or video is shot. The medium has no issue with allowing spirit this responsibility, who would better know what is dangerous and what is not? Remember, and this fact gets lost very quickly, people, including sitters, can be irreparably harmed or killed DEAD. I mean are you willing to be the one who calls Emergency Services and explain how the dead medium was killed because of a sitter's unwillingness to play by the rules or there is a foul-up unforeseen (spirit is far from perfect)?Thanks for patiently dealing what may sound as criticism from me, but is really me just thinking out loud about how to open this up to a wider audience and reduce the obvious sources of skepticism. Of course anything I was suggesting would have to be managed and accepted and planned by the medium and/or spirit. I would never suggest doing this sort of thing surreptitiously. I have heard about a death back in the 30's I think, of a famous female PM. Can't remember her name. I hope to gain more insight into this whole process when I visit a PM in the next few days. After that experience, I assume I will have a deeper insight into the process. Can't wait! (2017-09-04, 05:38 PM)jkmac Wrote: Thanks for patiently dealing what may sound as criticism from me, but is really me just thinking out loud about how to open this up to a wider audience and reduce the obvious sources of skepticism. No worries, your experience is important to me, I learn from it. Her name was most probably Helen Duncan. Guess who was The Prime Minister ordained into the Grand Ancient Order of Druids and was a client and also a keen supporter of Helen Duncan? heh Synchronicities, yes? When you visit with Caylor, get to the seance room an hour or so in advance, Warren typically shows up then. Ask him about it. Who knows, he may have a change of heart. Enjoy yourself, PM is a life-changing event. (2017-09-04, 05:55 PM)Pssst Wrote: No worries, your experience is important to me, I learn from it. Her name was most probably Helen Duncan. Guess who was The Prime Minister ordained into the Grand Ancient Order of Druids and was a client and also a keen supporter of Helen Duncan? hehYes it was Helen. And yes,,, quite a synchronicity. I have learned in the last few years to watch and learn from such occurrences... As far as the session- Planning to get there quite early. Thanks
Here is some more illustrations and photographs to how physical mediums did their tricks.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)