The Psi Encyclopedia has just published an article on Gerard Croiset (1909-1980), who is claimed to have used psi to locate many missing persons:
https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/artic...rd-croiset
The article notes that "His reputation was later damaged by posthumous revelations that [Professor W. H. C.] Tenhaeff exaggerated and sometimes falsified accounts of claimed successes."
Coincidentally, I am currently reading "Murder in the 4th Estate" (1971) by Peter Deeley and Christopher Walker, a book about the kidnapping and presumed murder of Muriel McKay in the UK in 1969. Croiset was requested to help by Mrs McKay's family, and his activities are dealt with on pages 80-84, 109 and 138. According to the authors (who had apparently interviewed Croiset), a family friend went to see Croiset taking a photograph of Mrs McKay and a map of London and its suburbs. Croiset told them he got an impression of a white farm and around it were trees and a green barn. He also described another nearby farm, mentioning a deserted airstrip, a concrete building and an old motorcycle half-submerged in a shallow pond. He said the kidnappers' route had taken them on a road heading north-north-east out of London, which he apparently indicated on the map. The police investigated and were led by this information to a deserted building on the Essex-Hertfordshire border, but they found nothing there. Croiset's interpretation was that the police had found the nearby farm he had indicated, but hadn't gone on to the farm used by the kidnappers, which was a few miles away.
Unfortunately the authors don't identify the building the police searched, but the kidnappers' farm was about a mile from the Essex-Hertfordshire border, and it is indeed north-north-east of London (a bearing of about 30 degrees from the centre), so on the face of it Croiset's description was quite accurate.
However, if the authors got that description from Croiset after the event, it wouldn't have much evidential value. It seems likely they did get it from Croiset, as for obvious reasons it wouldn't have been released at the time.
I note that a book entitled "The Outline of Parapsychology," by Jesse Hong Xiong, claims that Croiset said that the kidnappers were "two colored men living on an old farm," which would be remarkable if accurate - they were Trinidadians of Asian ancestry, and the farm dated from the 17th century according to Deeley and Walker. Xiong's source is apparently Brian Inglis, "The Paranormal," p. 39 (1985):
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ILFP...EC&pg=PA98
https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/artic...rd-croiset
The article notes that "His reputation was later damaged by posthumous revelations that [Professor W. H. C.] Tenhaeff exaggerated and sometimes falsified accounts of claimed successes."
Coincidentally, I am currently reading "Murder in the 4th Estate" (1971) by Peter Deeley and Christopher Walker, a book about the kidnapping and presumed murder of Muriel McKay in the UK in 1969. Croiset was requested to help by Mrs McKay's family, and his activities are dealt with on pages 80-84, 109 and 138. According to the authors (who had apparently interviewed Croiset), a family friend went to see Croiset taking a photograph of Mrs McKay and a map of London and its suburbs. Croiset told them he got an impression of a white farm and around it were trees and a green barn. He also described another nearby farm, mentioning a deserted airstrip, a concrete building and an old motorcycle half-submerged in a shallow pond. He said the kidnappers' route had taken them on a road heading north-north-east out of London, which he apparently indicated on the map. The police investigated and were led by this information to a deserted building on the Essex-Hertfordshire border, but they found nothing there. Croiset's interpretation was that the police had found the nearby farm he had indicated, but hadn't gone on to the farm used by the kidnappers, which was a few miles away.
Unfortunately the authors don't identify the building the police searched, but the kidnappers' farm was about a mile from the Essex-Hertfordshire border, and it is indeed north-north-east of London (a bearing of about 30 degrees from the centre), so on the face of it Croiset's description was quite accurate.
However, if the authors got that description from Croiset after the event, it wouldn't have much evidential value. It seems likely they did get it from Croiset, as for obvious reasons it wouldn't have been released at the time.
I note that a book entitled "The Outline of Parapsychology," by Jesse Hong Xiong, claims that Croiset said that the kidnappers were "two colored men living on an old farm," which would be remarkable if accurate - they were Trinidadians of Asian ancestry, and the farm dated from the 17th century according to Deeley and Walker. Xiong's source is apparently Brian Inglis, "The Paranormal," p. 39 (1985):
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ILFP...EC&pg=PA98