Consciousness during CPR

Interestingly, van Lommel's statements were already demonstrably wrong on the basis of the studies he referenced in support of those statements. We had a discussion, on the Skeptiko mind/body forum several years ago, where some of the forum members actually looked at the references (instead of taking van Lommel's word for it). It was eye-opening for them to discover that the studies did not show zero EEG activity (https://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/skep...tudy/page2 - please note that a number of posts were deleted by the mods as Alex wanted to move away from discussions about evidence). I contacted van Lommel about this and he admitted that it was his (unsupported) opinion that the EEG activity seen was inadequate, and that his statements about "flat EEG" were meant to convey that.

I agree that ongoing research, which continues to show blood flow, oxygenation, and activity associated with CPR, adds more nails to the coffin. But that coffin lid seems to have been closed quite a while ago.  

We also had a discussion here earlier this year on the subjects who were in position to see hidden targets, but did not, in Penny Sartori's study.

https://psiencequest.net/forums/thread-d...4#pid27524

Linda

On the contrary, 80% of the patients in that poster had zero electrical activity even with prolonged CPR. The rest had seizures and discharges and a couple had some alpha waves (during prolonged CPR). How does that explain veridical out of body experiences ? They report actions and behaviour/objects which are completely out of their (even potential) gaze. They lie on their back with their eyes closed facing upwards. The only thing they could potentially see is what is directly above them even if their eyes were wide open.  

And most patients in hospital don't receive CPR. See this PDF article by Keith Wood a former poster on the Skeptiko forum : https://www.newdualism.org/nde-papers/Wo...--1-12.pdf

Constant failures from studies, Van Lommel's being wrong on rhe zero EEG and blood flow during CPR, unrealible accounts on what is considered veridical OBEs, mostly.

There is a huge gap between self reported NDEs, and what happens in studies like AWARE. I really can't trust that anymore, I need proof and investigators are usually proponents, so that is gonna be biased.

Also, the fact that Cherylee Black's "powers" are considered a NDE proof really distresses me.

Being agnostic on this subject - I don't wholly agree with this characterization, but I also don't see that anything's come along to make any of this different than it's been for the past year. You've given many full-throated statements in support of NDEs in that time, some fairly recently, so it's rather odd to see you shift gears so abruptly. I've said this before - with respect, you seem prone to change your views rather impulsively, on minimal input. I sometimes fall into that myself, so I can empathize, but it doesn't strike me that either view could be that deeply held.

Interestingly, van Lommel's statements were already demonstrably wrong on the basis of the studies he referenced in support of those statements. We had a discussion, on the Skeptiko mind/body forum several years ago, where some of the forum members actually looked at the references (instead of taking van Lommel's word for it). It was eye-opening for them to discover that the studies did not show zero EEG activity (https://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/skep...tudy/page2 - please note that a number of posts were deleted by the mods as Alex wanted to move away from discussions about evidence). I contacted van Lommel about this and he admitted that it was his (unsupported) opinion that the EEG activity seen was inadequate, and that his statements about "flat EEG" were meant to convey that.

I agree that ongoing research, which continues to show blood flow, oxygenation, and activity associated with CPR, adds more nails to the coffin. But that coffin lid seems to have been closed quite a while ago.  

We also had a discussion here earlier this year on the subjects who were in position to see hidden targets, but did not, in Penny Sartori's study.

https://psiencequest.net/forums/thread-d...4#pid27524

Linda

Wow, what the hell. Wish I had heard about this earlier...

Wow, what the hell. Wish I had heard about this earlier...

Yeah, Van Lommel was very wrong on the subject.

Like many researchers he is biased, so he'll take as true stuff that has never been proved.

This also honestly debunks the idea that CA = true death state.

More generally, I don't think the Tetris paper offers much if any support for your examples either. The author of the Tetris paper wasn't investigating the injection of sensory information into normal peoples dreams. The author was investigating amnesiac recall during sleep, of very repetitive experiences (hours spent playing Tetris) that took place hours before sleep was initiated. The Tetris paper is not a study about the injection of real-time sensory data (house alarms) into normal peoples dreams. Additionally, there were alot of assumptions made in the paper which I'm not sure I agree with.

Both are examples of implicit memories from sensory data (I did not specify that the sound of the house alarm was real-time or contemporaneous with the dream, although whether or not implicit memories are expressed near the time they are formed, or later, is irrelevant) which were expressed in dreams. In neither case are there any conscious memories about the sensory experience of playing Tetris or of hearing a house alarm.

It is also irrelevant (just like in the Tetris study), that mention of dream mentation is an explicit process, just like completing a word stem is an explicit process. How an implicit memory is expressed (if ever) is not relevant to where/how the memories are encoded compared to conscious memories. Almost any expression of an implicit memory probably involves conscious processes in some way - like a choice based on preference or singing along to a song on the radio.

Linda

Max, I'm curious (and perhaps it would help the discussion) but could you give me an example of what an implicit memory might look like?  I'm very new to this subject so trying to learn a bit here.