The SPR has a review by Chris Jensen Romer of "The Bothell Hell House: Poltergeist of Washington State" (2nd edition) by Keith Linder, which was published early last year:
https://www.spr.ac.uk/book-review/bothel...ith-linder
Evidently many people consider this case to be a hoax, and the book was written by one of the two people who lived in the house and allegedly experienced the phenomena. Romer writes that while he was assessing the book "I was repeatedly approached by very different individuals who encouraged me to give up, to protect my reputation, to not further a ‘known hoax’ and to avoid the case." But he continued to read the book, and in fact was contacted by the author and discussed the case (though not the book or the review) with him at length.
Essentially, Romer's conclusion seems to be that psychical researchers are prejudiced against the case and have been remiss in not investigating it. He writes that "it would be entirely possible for a dedicated team to track down perhaps a score of people named in this book, and ask them to confirm or deny what is said about their experiences at the house." In fact, given that he himself is in contact with the author, who has already sent him "voluminous quantities of information," I doubt that it would even require a dedicated team to do that. But it does make it sound as though he is dependent almost entirely on the author's own claims (though he does mention a positive report by Steve Mera and Don Phillips [Philips]).
I can't help thinking it's a bit unfair to criticise other people for not devoting time to investigating something they find unbelievable, given the limited resources available. I suppose we all have different "boggle thresholds," and it's a decision everyone has to make for him/herself.