Vortex,
I'm not advocating for censorship of the topic. I'm advocating that we try to be well-informed, which means that we should be interested in valid answers to your questions (which are all good questions). I don't see how we can get there given that Henry's Bauer's answers will be colored by a false narrative. Bauer regards his denialism as valid, so it will be about how scientists reject valid ideas, instead of scientists rejection of invalid ideas.
Linda
I'm not advocating for censorship of the topic. I'm advocating that we try to be well-informed, which means that we should be interested in valid answers to your questions (which are all good questions). I don't see how we can get there given that Henry's Bauer's answers will be colored by a false narrative. Bauer regards his denialism as valid, so it will be about how scientists reject valid ideas, instead of scientists rejection of invalid ideas.
Linda