The physical mediumship supposedly on display in the documentary just wasn't impressive or even convincing IMO.
Honestly what baffles me are some negative reviews on IMDB complaining that there were too many unanswered questions about how NDEs, spirits, reincarnation and the afterlife work: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13649692/re...1&rtm_sr=1
This latest 1 star review just made me want to scream, though I am starting to think this is yet another troll review. At least a third of those questions aren't even relevant and surely can't be serious, right?
To me, it is just silly to demand so much from two episodes, because of course we don't have all the answers, and not every single skeptical point could be addressed in an episode that's only an hour long. That wouldn't make for an interesting watch. Most of that reviewers points have either been addressed by Fenwick and Greyson already, or some other researcher. Just do the research! It isn't that hard!
I mean, why on earth would the documentary talk about the 'evolution' and workings of consciousness in such detail when we don't even know? Why would it be expected to give full explanations of how exactly the afterlife and spirits and reincarnation work when we still can't confirm anything absolute about it?
Oh, and the heartless bashing of people who do believe pretty much confirms the intellectual laziness and ignorance of these militant atheist critics. The documentary never claims to give all the answers, because we don't have them. It even states that we have no definitive proof. So why would you ever think that asking questions about how these things precisely work would somehow undermine their validity?
(This post was last modified: 2021-01-20, 01:09 PM by OmniVersalNexus.)
Honestly what baffles me are some negative reviews on IMDB complaining that there were too many unanswered questions about how NDEs, spirits, reincarnation and the afterlife work: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13649692/re...1&rtm_sr=1
This latest 1 star review just made me want to scream, though I am starting to think this is yet another troll review. At least a third of those questions aren't even relevant and surely can't be serious, right?
To me, it is just silly to demand so much from two episodes, because of course we don't have all the answers, and not every single skeptical point could be addressed in an episode that's only an hour long. That wouldn't make for an interesting watch. Most of that reviewers points have either been addressed by Fenwick and Greyson already, or some other researcher. Just do the research! It isn't that hard!
I mean, why on earth would the documentary talk about the 'evolution' and workings of consciousness in such detail when we don't even know? Why would it be expected to give full explanations of how exactly the afterlife and spirits and reincarnation work when we still can't confirm anything absolute about it?
Oh, and the heartless bashing of people who do believe pretty much confirms the intellectual laziness and ignorance of these militant atheist critics. The documentary never claims to give all the answers, because we don't have them. It even states that we have no definitive proof. So why would you ever think that asking questions about how these things precisely work would somehow undermine their validity?