(2019-12-23, 03:58 PM)Raf999 Wrote: Sorry but it look clear to me that I expressed the possibility of fraud as very remote. It surely isn't the first thing that comes to my mind.By plugging your ears and calling the experiencer "wrong" or "naive", you are doing nothing but grasping at straws. If you can't explain away someones NDE (and no, a tiny little brain surge during CPR which may be nothing at all; does not explain away Bellg's case) you go for the lowest hanging fruit and attack the experiencer/researcher. As for Eben's experience, the skeptics did nothing but launch a smear campaign, using tactics similar to what you have demonstrated lately. As I have stated on the AwareofAware blog, you seem to be brushing things about NDE's under a rug. However as I have also said, the rug is getting full.
But she may just be wrong or naive, maybe both. Being naive is something I've noticed a lot in proponents, in particular regardin Eben Alexander's NDE. When skeptics "debunked" the rainbow event, proponents refuted it basing themselves on the word of Eben's family. I mean, is there a possibly more biased view than that of his family? If want to have proofs, we need to gather it from neutral witnesses
What is my purpose in life de geso...?
(This post was last modified: 2019-12-23, 04:20 PM by Ika Musume.)