You know I know that all proported mediums aren't always really what they claim to be, but this makes me kind of doubtful that any are really what they claim they are capable of. What do you all say to this?
Afterlife contact forum (deathbed visions, ADC, mediumship)
11 Replies
Chris, 2018-03-25, 11:28 PM
Courtesy of the SPR Facebook page, Beachcombing's Bizarre History Blog has two sceptical posts on the medium Helen Duncan and her alleged communications about the sinking of British ships during the Second World War: http://www.strangehistory.net/2018/03/22...ceptic-spe
[quote]
...With DMT implicated in greed, violence and revenge, the creators of Sense8 express a seriously ambivalent attitude towards the ‘spirit molecule’. Good or bad? Tragic or transcendent? A source of hope or
[quote]
[size=small]Is the conception of divine causality defended by classical theists like Aquinas (and which I defend in [url=https://www.amazon.com/Five-Proofs-Existence-Edw
Happened to think about the forum here when I was having a discussion over lunch with my father about UFOs and so on. He's a rather religious fellow, and waves off UFOs because the only knowledge he has of them are wacko tV shows claiming to be about them. He must think anybody who is even slightly
DNA analysis has confirmed the human origins of the skeleton, as a malformed female baby who was probably stillborn or died soon after birth, in the mid-20th century: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018...n-skeleton
Always found the "tunnel of light" phenomenon in NDEs to be one of the first qualities skeptics always attempt to debunk, because there are admittedly a lot of things that cause vaguely similar effects as seeing a light. They are usually bunk, and this one probably is to, but what about the explanat
Mastodon