This is a companion piece that I’ll be referencing for my Energy Explanation thread. It is written to the best of my memory.
At about 3am, mothers day 2015. I was laying on the bed just thinking about stuff. Dreamsoap was in the other room on the computer probably playing a game of some type, I d
Sad news tonight where I live. I know he was a materialist by nature and a lot of us here don't agree with him on things, but it's neither here nor there now. Definitely doesn't defeat what he did help discover for mankind going forward. Brilliant man.
I have to say that I was surprised to see this article appear on the web site of the New Scientist which has always struck me as a rather conservative, mainstream publication. The NS, unfortunately, only gives limited access to its pages - a couple of free views before the paywall comes down, so I h
I like and respect Donald Hoffmann but I sometimes have difficulty following his language because I'm not familiar with the scientific terms. Quite often he can be found in videos debating with other consciousness theorists like Daniel Dennett and the debate becomes heavily laden with such terminolo
Watched Ex Machina again, and was wondering; are we absolutely "wired" to respond to a likeness of a human, even if we now it is not? Would we be fooled, even though we "know" that we shouldn't? I mean, we mostly would be flipping back
Now, something to note here: I'm talking about actual explanations beyond the usual coincidence and fraud hand waves. As in if psi is a real phenomenon, then could it have a materialistic mechanism? Like what Ed May has tried to claim with his "retrocausality" approach. Just the topic for one second
Mastodon