The Global Consciousness Project

[Laird]

In the blog post Global Consciousness and the Coronavirus Crisis, Roger Nelson also shares details about further studies of the data, "look[ing] at the seven-hour long period when the US stock market is open, on several days beginning with March 11, 2020", the latest of which is the 27th of March.

While cautioning that these are informal studies, he writes that "The results for March 11-13, 16, and 17 showed strong departures on four days, one upward and three downward. The fifth case showed typical random variation" and notes that "The odds against chance for such a departure [as seen in the data from March 17] are about 50 to 1."

He also looked at the data for two hours during Pope Francis's special Urbi et Orbi beginning on Friday, March 27th at 6:00pm (CET), and found "a positive departure from what we would expect which supports GCP’s hypothesis".

This has always been one of those areas where I have to agree with many members "What are we even looking at?" 

A Pseudorandom (PRNG) and a True random number generator (TRNG), and now Quantum randomness, are very different.

I am a fan of thinking that what it should be supplying are other places to look and measure. If it is quantum, atmospheric, or a radioactive process, then these areas need to be monitored as well and compared. As other members have stated, if this is some immersive field, let's get to measuring this field and figuring it out.

I have also looked at global events and then jumped to the random generator to see the correlation and see nothing jumping out, and I see it jumping over the lines when nothing has happened. So it is obviously far from accurate and is not actually aligned with anything perfectly.

My conclusion has been that it is interesting to look at, but it isn't telling us much or explaining anything about what is happening. I don't see it as a direct link to Global consciousness. I see a direct link to the ego of human beings thinking there is some global consciousness pool that they are chasing after and trying to prove. It might be something totally unrelated.

Chasing only evidence to confirm an idea is considered confirmation bias, not proper science.