Talking ETs

If civilizations like Atlantis or Lemuria existed, how come there is very little physical evidence of it? As human consciousness cycles through periods of enlightenment and then "collapses into" a lower density of physicality perhaps that has far more built-in limitation and whose geophysical history does not reflect the idea of an Atlantis or Lemuria? You cannot be what you are not the vibration of...first.

As a collective, we have chosen to extricate ourselves from this now-expiring 'down cycle' and information of past civilizations is coming back to our collective consciousness. See sig below.  

(Un)fortunately, depending on your POV, some?/much? of the hard evidence of past civilizations have been unearthed from under the Sphinx/Anubis' left paw. It had been the reading of the collective energetic momentum that a few of the discoveries would be public at this point in time - correlating closely with Edgar Cayce's prediction of this discovery happening around 1998 - which, obviously, they are not.

A better starting place to start is with the actual construction of the Sphinx itself. It was never a pharaoh, a fox, a lion, a donkey, it is the depiction of an Anubis who was most often represented in ancient Egyptian society as sitting on a box, which is what the Sphinx "originally was", prior to being re-carved (researcher Robert Temple), when it was created 10,400 years +/- ago (a dating which aligns with the Orion correlation theory and Robert Schoch geological assessments). This information has been echoed many time by our ET communicators.

The statue of the jackal lying on a box-shrine apparently with a double meaning: watcher and keeper/master of mysteries set in place at the time when Virgo was transitioning into the age of Leo with Orion was due east in relation to it.

More later...

"For it is a very real possibility, indeed, that deep inside the oldest, the largest, the tallest, the most sacred monument on this planet, lies a heavily guarded secret. Inside the Great Pyramid of Giza, wrapped in some unearthly darkness and standing in hallowed stillness, could be a secret chamber or chambers, waiting, at any minute now to be opened after at least four if not many more millennia."

"This chamber could be the supreme archaeological prize, the jackpot of Egyptology that may by far surpass the discovery of Tutankhamun’s intact tomb in 1922. But wait, there is more. The Giza Plateau, it very much seems, has finally decided to disclose all its secrets at once. For not far from the Great Pyramid, in a shallow enclave to the east broods the Great Sphinx. It, too, may mulishly be guarding the ultimate treasure trove under its belly: the legendary “Hall of Records” of a civilization long lost in the mists of time."

"The location and possible entrances to such secret chambers in the Great Pyramid and under the Great Sphinx have been known since early 1993. Yet, as amazingly frustrating as it sounds, all attempts to confirm the existence of these possible secret chambers have been forcefully prevented by Zahi Hawass. Or have they really? Could clandestine attempts have been made away from the public eye and, as strange as it may be, from the eyes of the Egyptian authorities themselves? Is that at all possible? Is there a conspiracy afloat here, one that may implicate not just Hawass but other individuals and institutions?"

Robert Bauval

"For it is a very real possibility, indeed, that deep inside the oldest, the largest, the tallest, the most sacred monument on this planet, lies a heavily guarded secret. Inside the Great Pyramid of Giza, wrapped in some unearthly darkness and standing in hallowed stillness, could be a secret chamber or chambers, waiting, at any minute now to be opened after at least four if not many more millennia."

"This chamber could be the supreme archaeological prize, the jackpot of Egyptology that may by far surpass the discovery of Tutankhamun’s intact tomb in 1922. But wait, there is more. The Giza Plateau, it very much seems, has finally decided to disclose all its secrets at once. For not far from the Great Pyramid, in a shallow enclave to the east broods the Great Sphinx. It, too, may mulishly be guarding the ultimate treasure trove under its belly: the legendary “Hall of Records” of a civilization long lost in the mists of time."

"The location and possible entrances to such secret chambers in the Great Pyramid and under the Great Sphinx have been known since early 1993. Yet, as amazingly frustrating as it sounds, all attempts to confirm the existence of these possible secret chambers have been forcefully prevented by Zahi Hawass. Or have they really? Could clandestine attempts have been made away from the public eye and, as strange as it may be, from the eyes of the Egyptian authorities themselves? Is that at all possible? Is there a conspiracy afloat here, one that may implicate not just Hawass but other individuals and institutions?"

Robert Bauval

Asked and now (2014) answered.

"Some of these have actually already been discovered, and hidden, from the public; but most have not, for it is not yet quite time for some of its mysteries to be revealed; but there are still several there in the underground box in secret chambers that have yet to be opened, and will not be opened until a deeper understanding is had of frequency, of resonance, of ratio, and proportion. And when the right song is sung, and the right vibration resounds, the box will reveal its secrets one after the other. This may occur any time between now and the year you call 2050. It depends upon exactly the rate of acceleration in your society, the rate of ascension, what happens with respect to contact between your world and other civilizations in the contact window between 2025 and 2033 — for even contact will not necessarily be the right time for the revelation of some of the mysteries in the box under the Sphinx. But it will come." ~Bashar

Everything is energy, is consciousness, is vibratory, requires resonance, has an identifying, unique frequency.

I must confess I'm still struggling to understand the philiosophy here.

You told me on another thread the ETs were pre-post-modern. But I'm wondering whether they're really post-post-modern. I'm getting the impression we're expected to believe all the outlandish theories that have ever been proposed about anything, by anyone, at any time - perhaps on the basis that each of them is true in at least one alternative reality.

If you're getting at something like that, I think it's quite possible you'll be able to make the transition from Internet discussion boards to university philosophy departments in one easy leap (or possibly spin).

Again, you speculate to the point of obfuscation.

Time and time again I have quoted other ET sources than Bashar who I rely upon to augment my understanding of physical reality. Spirit talks about moon structures so do the astronauts from many nations. As do exopliticians, RVers (Swann, Daz Smith and McDoneagle) and many of the published and non-published OBErs. NASA ex-stafers, the list goes on and on.

I find knowledge in a compilation of evidences - somehow, someway this has magically eluded you or you are being snarky for the sake of who knows what- although Bashar, without any doubt, is the most prolific information-giver at this moment in time.

It's time that you quit purposefully attempting to narrowly define my experience-base when you - as do most daily readers of this forum - know better.

In the end-all, moon bases are inconsequential, whether you or I or anyone else believes they exist is inconsequential in light of the weightier matters of the spiritual day.

I am the one obfuscating? Now THAT's hilarious.

First- you are the one that offered the piece by Bashar. I didn't make up a reference to him (it?) out of whole cloth. I'm not "purposefully" doing anything but trying to learn more about what you think the moon is.

Second- If you wished to make the broader point- that bases on the moon are widely reported, you only have yourself to blame for not doing so. I didn't decide through some evil intent to limit the conversation to Bashar.

In any case- based on your last few posts it is clear to me that you believe that the moon:
1- Is artificial in that it was built in some fashion, and inserted in orbit around the the Earth, by non-Earth beings.
2- Is nearly unique in the fact that it is tidally locked with one face toward earth and the other hidden from us.
3- That tidal locking is an intentional part of the Moon's technical design, and is the result of a manufactured system embedded in the Moon.
4- Contains a base (bases?) and one would assume personnel for some purpose, I would guess surveillance.

All fine. Although, I'm at a loss as to why you are so indignant about me pointing these things out, and asking what I think are reasonable questions about the nature of the place. 

It seems thou dost protest too much. 

This is all good though. Really. 

I think it is helpful to know a little about the scope of the the world view of the people we talk to here on this site. It helps us decide the person's: overall credibility, level of discrimination, and propensity for discernment. Knowing these things helps us see a little bit through the veil that a forum like this hangs between us all. 

Bottom line: it lets us better know who we are talking to.

I am the one obfuscating? 

lol

http://www.experiencer.org/five-common-t...look-like/
[/url]
[url=http://www.experiencer.org/five-common-types-of-ets-and-what-they-look-like/]

In another part of the forum, there is a conversation that has emerged regarding the veracity of the professional ex-military who have reported of their UFO-ICBM and related encounters.

"I agree it's interesting, and some of these reports seem very hard to explain. I don't think they are lying, though of course there can be problems of recollection after such a long period of time, and problems of perception in the first place."

This is total bollocks, a hand wave in the face of men who spent hundreds of man-years in service in environments where recollection and problem assessment is requisite to the job.

Just crazy men like these two.

I must confess I'm still struggling to understand the philiosophy here.

You told me on another thread the ETs were pre-post-modern. But I'm wondering whether they're really post-post-modern. I'm getting the impression we're expected to believe all the outlandish theories that have ever been proposed about anything, by anyone, at any time - perhaps on the basis that each of them is true in at least one alternative reality.

If you're getting at something like that, I think it's quite possible you'll be able to make the transition from Internet discussion boards to university philosophy departments in one easy leap (or possibly spin).

It's not a philosophy. It is true if you can imagine it, it must exist somewhere, you cannot imagine the unimaginable.

In another part of the forum, there is a conversation that has emerged regarding the veracity of the professional ex-military who have reported of their UFO-ICBM and related encounters.

"I agree it's interesting, and some of these reports seem very hard to explain. I don't think they are lying, though of course there can be problems of recollection after such a long period of time, and problems of perception in the first place."

This is total bollocks, a hand wave in the face of men who spent hundreds of man-years in service in environments where recollection and problem assessment is requisite to the job.

You're one crazy cat.