(2018-12-11, 03:13 PM)Steve001 Wrote: I was right. Your assessment is a blanket interpretation for all skeptics applied specifically to me. For example why you're wrong. I recently liked one, maybe two of your posts. However, I guess that was a binary choice
Steve, your liking of the posts in question is just further validation of my perspective. You liked posts where I expressed my challenge of being convinced of something without evidence. I would have expected you to "like" that. Still binary.
Further, I do not lump all skeptics under one umbrella. Its one thing to be skeptical. Its another entirely to presuppose science can/does/will answer all questions.
(2018-12-11, 03:16 PM)fls Wrote: I was actually trying to be nice and give you an out
Might want to check that giant ego at the door Linda. I don't need an "out" as there isn't a right or wrong here. We are talking about perceptions of internet avatars based on what the human (presumably) behind it wrote. Just go ahead and be mean if the nice thing is just too taxing.
(2018-12-11, 03:16 PM)fls Wrote: So like you, he leaves open the possibility that there is something there. But you didn't bother reading what he says, and instead made up some BS about his perspective which allows you to insult him instead of addressing what he says. And of course, to fill in another square in the Bingo card, you went with the vague "posting history" reference. I'm going to take a stab at this and guess that you have paid attention to or read his posting history with the same care that you that you showed in this thread - i.e. not at all.
The reference you gave of one of Steve's post is just that: one post (Oh, and shoulder shrug's generally are connoted as dismissive). His posting history (of which I have read many, many posts) is generally not very open to the notion that science may not be the sole source of knowledge, wisdom, or insight. Its quite the contrary to my view. (Again, that nagging challenge for you here in that I am expressing my perception of Steve.)
Its also worth noting that I am likely not alone in this perspective on Steve. Sure, the community here may be comprised of a bunch of intellectually-stunted dreamers or socially inept souls. Or, perhaps, mine is a reasonable viewpoint of Steve the psiencequest avatar.
Again, I'll leave it to the community to opine.