Can Panpsychism Become An Observational Science? by Gregory L. Matloff
From a popular write-up:
I don't know that Matloff is aware of, or would be supportive, of people like Sheldrake, but the references to fields, and to the possible conscious behavior of stars, definitely remind me of him.
Another write-up by Matloff himself.
From a popular write-up:
Quote:Even in that context, Gregory Matloff’s ideas are shocking. The veteran physicist at New York City College of Technology recently published a paperarguing that humans may be like the rest of the universe in substance and in spirit. A “proto-consciousness field” could extend through all of space, he argues. Stars may be thinking entities that deliberately control their paths. Put more bluntly, the entire cosmos may be self-aware.
...The bottom line, Matloff argues, is that panpsychism is too important to ignore.
“It’s all very speculative, but it’s something we can check and either validate or falsify,” he says.
I don't know that Matloff is aware of, or would be supportive, of people like Sheldrake, but the references to fields, and to the possible conscious behavior of stars, definitely remind me of him.
Another write-up by Matloff himself.