A call-out (of skeptics) article A Note On The Alleged ‘Confession’ Of A ‘Hoax’ in the Enfield Poltergeist has been published on the EUROPARANORMAL blog.
Quote:The continual misquotation of Radnor out of context is the principle weakness of published attacks on the Enfield case. The favourite method adopted by the negative sceptic – found in other cases – is to select a statement or shred of evidence which is many years old, and was observed by somebody else. This then leads to inventing some possible alternative explanation, looking around for supporting facts which might have been present. No direct evidence of any sort is produced to show that such an alternative actually took place.
This approach also avoids direct examination of the evidence. Over the twenty year period I knew the principal investigator Maurice Grosse (1918-2006) I periodically asked if any sceptic had come to him personally to examine his collection of recordings. None had. The same was reported by his co-investigator Guy Playfair.
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
