Just bringing this up for discussion
. I haven't really seen this type of argument anywhere on the site , so here it is:
"I'm already there. I've been there for a long time. Long enough to review it all dozens of times, and I always arrive at the same conclusion. Although we don't know everything, we know enough to be sure that assumptions like those you allude to cannot reflect the actual state of affairs. There is no verifiable evidence that concepts like "higher selves" that facilitate movement in "extended consciousness realms" are anything more than imaginary places our minds dream-up. Anyone who has vivid dreams can tell you that the whole experience is completely lifelike — mine certainly are.
The brain is just that powerful. Even in cases where there seems to be some correlation between a dream state or OOBE experience, and objective reality, all that has happened is the acquisition of matching data, and that acquisition can usually be explained by a combination of sensory data, memory, and automatic visualization. It doesn't mean the person actually went anyplace and saw anything objectively real."
i wanted to ask why he would think that way , and based on what sources has he reached that conclusion , but this comment is around 2 years old , (i found it on skeptiko) and i don't think the author is still using the website since his last login was 2 years ago approximately , so i decided to bring it here and maybe spark a discussion.
and that acquisition can usually be explained by a combination of sensory data, memory, and automatic visualization. It doesn't mean the person actually went anyplace and saw anything objectively real.
also , i would like to know if the brain still gathers sensory data during cardiac arrest/anesthesia , i'm not knowledgeable at all on this type of situations so a little bit of help would be appreciated , have a great day!

"I'm already there. I've been there for a long time. Long enough to review it all dozens of times, and I always arrive at the same conclusion. Although we don't know everything, we know enough to be sure that assumptions like those you allude to cannot reflect the actual state of affairs. There is no verifiable evidence that concepts like "higher selves" that facilitate movement in "extended consciousness realms" are anything more than imaginary places our minds dream-up. Anyone who has vivid dreams can tell you that the whole experience is completely lifelike — mine certainly are.
The brain is just that powerful. Even in cases where there seems to be some correlation between a dream state or OOBE experience, and objective reality, all that has happened is the acquisition of matching data, and that acquisition can usually be explained by a combination of sensory data, memory, and automatic visualization. It doesn't mean the person actually went anyplace and saw anything objectively real."
i wanted to ask why he would think that way , and based on what sources has he reached that conclusion , but this comment is around 2 years old , (i found it on skeptiko) and i don't think the author is still using the website since his last login was 2 years ago approximately , so i decided to bring it here and maybe spark a discussion.
and that acquisition can usually be explained by a combination of sensory data, memory, and automatic visualization. It doesn't mean the person actually went anyplace and saw anything objectively real.
also , i would like to know if the brain still gathers sensory data during cardiac arrest/anesthesia , i'm not knowledgeable at all on this type of situations so a little bit of help would be appreciated , have a great day!