Quote:In this 2017 video, she elaborates on her interpretation of findings in physics and cosmology that point to the role of information in the origin and expansion of our physical universe. She maintains that, as the universe expands, the amount of information in the universe also increases. This growth in complexity is related to Shannon Entropy -- and it leads to a new understanding of entropy and time. She maintains a panpsychist view that the entire universe is conscious.
Quote:She holds a PhD in Archaeology from the University of Reading in the UK researching ancient cosmologies and a Masters Degree in Physics from Oxford University specialising in cosmology and quantum physics.
She is the author of seven non-fiction books currently available in 16 languages and 26 countries including CosMos – a co-creator’s guide to the whole-world co-authored with Dr Ervin Laszlo. Her first fictionalised e-book Legacy is available at amazon.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'
- Bertrand Russell
Here's another, more recent video interview that I'm listening to that might be of interest to some folk here.
1:09 - Journey to spirituality and science
4:24 - What it means to be “weird” in science.
10:54 - Connection of Spirituality and Science
15:54 - Definition of consciousness
22:30 - Quantum entanglement and quantum non-locality
25:26 - What is the cosmic hologram?
35:19 - How are we physical?
37:29 - What is the definition of universal time?
49:54 - Is the expansion of the universe going faster than expected?
55:16 - What is sacred geometry?
59:34 - Who created the Great Pyramid of Giza?
1:04:44 - What is the future of dogmatic programming?
(This post was last modified: 2023-06-23, 03:58 PM by Ninshub. Edited 3 times in total.)
I haven't got there yet. Maybe jump to those topics, see what she says about them, if you think it's crazy foolishness dismiss it and her! But they may be the interviewer's questions.
I'll jump there myself to see what she says.
(This post was last modified: 2023-06-23, 04:24 PM by Ninshub. Edited 1 time in total.)
Re: sacred geometry. She's talking about 1s and 0s, fractal patterns, generalities, stuff that goes over my head. I don't get the sense this means she buys into everything everybody says about the topic.
Re: the Great Pyramid. She doesn't really answer the question specifically "Who created the GP?" So I think that title and what it implies may be not be a good description of what she's generally saying here.
Rewinding to where I was in the interview, around 24 minutes, is where I think it gets more interesting, her talking about the 2018 experiment re: Bell's Inequality and what that showed.
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
