Bringing balance to the universe: New theory could explain missing 95 percent...

A step back? Looks like a definite step forward to me. But in any case, not really sure why you think why negative mass particles must mean plasma cosmology? Whatever that exactly is?

You've not heard of The Plasma Cosmology? Look up "electric universe"

A step back? Looks like a definite step forward to me. But in any case, not really sure why you think why negative mass particles must mean plasma cosmology? Whatever that exactly is?

"Step back" here meant suggesting something that, to me, looks like an idea from an older theory, not any sort of regression in a negative or pejorative sense. But I'm very very far from knowledgeable on any branch of physics, so the connection may well be shallow and coincidental, even a misunderstanding on my part.

"Step back" here meant suggesting something that, to me, looks like an idea from an older theory, not any sort of regression in a negative or pejorative sense. But I'm very very far from knowledgeable on any branch of physics, so the connection may well be shallow and coincidental, even a misunderstanding on my part.

Some blogs on this subject.https://telescoper.wordpress.com/2018/12...cosmology/

https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2018/1...j4mKtw&m=1

The media is doing us no favors on so many fronts.  No clue if this one ends up being another example of poor media work, but their role in amping up the anti-science rhetoric is real to my view.  Its scary.