6.37 sigma replication of Dean Radin's double slit consciousness experiments

Roberta · Roberta 2017-09-03, 08:06 PM

(2017-09-03, 08:05 PM)Max_B Wrote: Radin's study...

Excellent, now let's try the second question again, if it's due to sound, why do meditators do so much better then non meditators?

#42 · Chris 2017-09-03, 08:12 PM Unregistered

(2017-09-03, 08:05 PM)Max_B Wrote: Radin's study...

I think Radin's study perhaps deserves a thread of its own. But according to Guerrer's paper, in his experiment the sound feedback was provided through quite high-grade headphones.

Roberta · Roberta 2017-09-03, 08:36 PM

(2017-09-03, 08:14 PM)Max_B Wrote: which paper...?

Any of Radin's, let's say the one you took the picture from. Why do meditators do better if it's due to sound?

Roberta · Roberta 2017-09-03, 08:47 PM

(2017-09-03, 08:37 PM)Max_B Wrote: Which paper?

You can just say 'there is no reason that meditators would do better if the results were due to sound' you know.

Roberta · Roberta 2017-09-03, 09:05 PM

(2017-09-03, 09:02 PM)Max_B Wrote: You could just point me at the paper, and explain what specific parts of it you think are significant...

I did, the paper which you got the picture from. The meditators did much better then non meditators did - if it's due to sound why is this the case?

6.37 sigma replication of Dean Radin's double slit consciousness experiments

Roberta

Chris

Roberta

Roberta

Roberta