6.37 sigma replication of Dean Radin's double slit consciousness experiments

Radin's study...

Excellent, now let's try the second question again, if it's due to sound, why do meditators do so much better then non meditators?

Radin's study...

I think Radin's study perhaps deserves a thread of its own. But according to Guerrer's paper, in his experiment the sound feedback was provided through quite high-grade headphones.

Excellent, now let's try the second question again, if it's due to sound, why do meditators do so much better then non meditators?

which paper...?

which paper...?

Any of Radin's, let's say the one you took the picture from. Why do meditators do better if it's due to sound?

Any of Radin's, let's say the one you took the picture from. Why do meditators do better if it's due to sound?

Which paper?

Which paper?

You can just say 'there is no reason that meditators would do better if the results were due to sound' you know.

You can just say 'there is no reason that meditators would do better if the results were due to sound' you know.

You could just point me at the paper, and explain what specific parts of it you think are significant...

You could just point me at the paper, and explain what specific parts of it you think are significant...

I did, the paper which you got the picture from. The meditators did much better then non meditators did - if it's due to sound why is this the case?

I did, the paper which you got the picture from. The meditators did much better then non meditators did - if it's due to sound why is this the case?

You point me at the paper, and explain the part which supports your claim...

I did, the paper which you got the picture from. The meditators did much better then non meditators did - if it's due to sound why is this the case?

To help you... here's the paper that the photo came from...

http://www.quantumbiosystems.org/admin/f...082-98.pdf