A Logically and Mathematically Consistent Argument for Psi and The Afterlife?

Yeah it's still in the hypothesis realm though he has mentioned some potential findings of Orch-OR that might buttress it. What I like about Arvan's writing is he notes that the physical universe is functionally a simulation in which we, as conscious entities, are non-computational "players". So it's not that there's a Matrix, but rather a higher frame that "instantiates" a lower frame.

I can see it working with synchronicity as the world is an "average" drawn from the sum of observers, so what's on your mind would skew things to some degree. Emotional content might even weight the probabilities, if we're willing to get into more speculation...

The need for a non-computational element (meaning consciousness) is a commonality across several of these VR ideas. They use the "avatar" term some times, but it seems more complex than simply placing an avatar in a simulated sandbox, since there is an element of formalization or at least stabilization of the properties as well.

Yes, I have pondered that before and there is certainly more to it (it's no coincidence that it happens so many times around the same person and under remarkably different circumstances), but the phenomena is too volatile and random to deduce much more than the existence of underlying patterns... And the possibility of biasing the way that they manifest.