Interview with Dr. Henry Bauer - Part 1

And this just illustrates the whole problem with trying to have any kind of reasonable discussion with fls. 

She made a statement that wasn't true. It was demonstrated mathematically to be false. But will she admit she got it wrong? Never in a million years!

Instead we just get endless spin, trying to make out she didn't actually mean what she said, there was something she'd implied, and it was our fault for not having guessed it, and so on and so forth ad nauseam. And in the end, she tries to play the victim, and claims we're trying to "defame" her. 

Just the same on this thread. There were some fairly non-contentious remarks about falsifiability of hypotheses. In she jumps, quoting the paper about "p" and "not p", "q" and "not q", misunderstanding pretty much the whole thing, trying to make a totally bogus distinction between looking at "p" being confirming and looking at "not q" being falsifying - when in fact there's no difference at all between them - and in the end the whole thread gets covered in confusion and tied in knots. Any chance of an acknowledgment she got it wrong? No chance at all! Just the usual stream of snide remarks and condescension, trying to make out it's everyone else's fault.

And I suspect she's just loving every minute of it...