(2017-10-11, 11:41 PM)jkmac Wrote: [ -> ]OK. So there are all these bases on the dark side of the moon. But the entire moon has now been mapped at high resolution. Where are the picture so these bases?
The entire
surface of the moon has been mapped. Regardless, beings that can travel interdimensionally, without time lapse, shouldn't have a whole lot of problems with remaining undercover.
Their function on the moon varies. They are lookouts watching us as we break through into new enlightenments, some are way-stationers, others are mining, a few are regulating...
"There are electro-gravitic implants within the body of the Moon, deep within. They are discovered and registered on your instrumentation as what you have referred to as
mascons: massive concentrations deep within the body of the Moon about what you would call 20 miles below the surface, that are large disc-like objects, that are responsible for creating a relocation of the gravitational matrix and moving the Moon, to its present location, and regulating its orbit." ~Bashar, 1997
(2017-10-12, 05:33 PM)Pssst Wrote: [ -> ]The entire surface of the moon has been mapped. Regardless, beings that can travel interdimensionally, without time lapse, shouldn't have a whole lot of problems with remaining undercover.
Their function on the moon varies. They are lookouts watching us as we break through into new enlightenments, some are way-stationers, others are mining, a few are regulating...
"There are electro-gravitic implants within the body of the Moon, deep within. They are discovered and registered on your instrumentation as what you have referred to as mascons: massive concentrations deep within the body of the Moon about what you would call 20 miles below the surface, that are large disc-like objects, that are responsible for creating a relocation of the gravitational matrix and moving the Moon, to its present location, and regulating its orbit." ~Bashar, 1997
So what you are saying is: that if Bashar says it, you will believe it, even if not a shred of evidence is provided.
Hey, go right ahead. It's your choice.
It's the same thing I said in a post last week: when do we decide, no,,, that I won't believe. I understand, it's hard to draw a line. But these things are WAY past my personal line. There's just no reason to believe it in terms of evidence, that I am aware of.
UFOs? Yes. This stuff? Nope. Not for me.
(2017-10-12, 07:05 PM)jkmac Wrote: [ -> ]So what you are saying is: that if Bashar says it, you will believe it, even if not a shred of evidence is provided.
Hey, go right ahead. It's your choice.
It's the same thing I said in a post last week: when do we decide, no,,, that I won't believe. I understand, it's hard to draw a line. But these things are WAY past my personal line. There's just no reason to believe it in terms of evidence, that I am aware of.
UFOs? Yes. This stuff? Nope. Not for me.
I keep going over this with you, it is getting to be old ground.
I never stated that Bashar is 100% credible and absolutely accurate, that is your extrapolation and poorly done.
I find the evidence in what he says
in regard to how this physical illusion works, why we are here, and how to go about our business in the most efficient manner to maximize our experiences. Remember me stating that all of this could be condensed onto an 8" x 11" piece of paper? It ain't rocket science.
If you want evidence, find the basic concepts he teaches, try them on and see for yourself. Otherwise, you are making decisions based on your own self-imposed limitations, a serious lack of understanding of the character of the communicating ET factions and definitions that are narrowly limited and derived from an over-tasked physical mind.
(2017-10-12, 07:31 PM)Pssst Wrote: [ -> ]I keep going over this with you, it is getting to be old ground.
I never stated that Bashar is 100% credible and absolutely accurate, that is your extrapolation and poorly done.
I find the evidence in what he says in regard to how this physical illusion works, why we are here, and how to go about our business in the most efficient manner to maximize our experiences. Remember me stating that all of this could be condensed onto an 8" x 11" piece of paper? It ain't rocket science.
If you want evidence, find the basic concepts he teaches, try them on and see for yourself. Otherwise, you are making decisions based on your own self-imposed limitations, a serious lack of understanding of the character of the communicating ET factions and definitions that are narrowly limited and derived from an over-tasked physical mind.
I'm not talking about concepts. I'm talking about bases on the moon.
These are not things I need to try on for myself. They either are, or the are not.
We are not talking about philosophy at this moment. We are talking about whether disks are or are not located 20 miles below the surface of the moon. Bashar said they are. You are telling me they are. I can only assume that the reason you believe they are, is because Bashar said so.
Why are you making this more convoluted than that simple fact?
Pssst
The thing is, though, the information you got from your sources about the moon turned out to be badly wrong. Doesn't that make you wonder about the reliability of the information?
(2017-10-12, 07:43 PM)Chris Wrote: [ -> ]Pssst
The thing is, though, the information you got from your sources about the moon turned out to be badly wrong. Doesn't that make you wonder about the reliability of the information?
There not badly wrong, that's an attempt to invalidate not well played.
(2017-10-12, 08:03 PM)Pssst Wrote: [ -> ]There not badly wrong, that's an attempt to invalidate not well played.
You think it's not badly wrong to say that the moon is the only satellite in the known universe with that property, when it's the norm for satellites of that kind? And that false statement was coupled with a claim that the moon had been technologically altered to have that property? You say it really doesn't make you wonder about the reliability of your sources?
(2017-10-12, 07:42 PM)jkmac Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not talking about concepts. I'm talking about bases on the moon.
These are not things I need to try on for myself. They either are, or the are not.
We are not talking about philosophy at this moment. We are talking about whether disks are or are not located 20 miles below the surface of the moon. Bashar said they are. You are telling me they are. I can only assume that the reason you believe they are, is because Bashar said so.
Why are you making this more convoluted than that simple fact?
Again, you speculate to the point of obfuscation.
Time and time again I have quoted other ET sources than Bashar who I rely upon to augment my understanding of physical reality. Spirit talks about moon structures so do the astronauts from many nations. As do exopliticians, RVers (Swann, Daz Smith and McDoneagle) and many of the published and non-published OBErs. NASA ex-stafers, the list goes on and on.
I find knowledge in a compilation of evidences - somehow, someway this has magically eluded you or you are being snarky for the sake of who knows what- although Bashar, without any doubt, is the most prolific information-giver at this moment in time.
It's time that you quit purposefully attempting to narrowly define my experience-base when you - as do most daily readers of this forum - know better.
In the end-all, moon bases are inconsequential, whether you or I or anyone else believes they exist is inconsequential in light of the weightier matters of the spiritual day.
If civilizations like Atlantis or Lemuria existed, how come there is very little physical evidence of it? As human consciousness cycles through periods of enlightenment and then "collapses into" a lower density of physicality perhaps that has far more built-in limitation and whose geophysical history does not reflect the idea of an Atlantis or Lemuria? You cannot be what you are not the vibration of...first.
As a collective, we have chosen to extricate ourselves from this now-expiring 'down cycle' and information of past civilizations is coming back to our collective consciousness. See sig below.
(Un)fortunately, depending on your POV, some?/much? of the hard evidence of past civilizations have been unearthed from under the Sphinx/Anubis' left paw. It had been the reading of the collective energetic momentum that a few of the discoveries would be public at this point in time - correlating closely with Edgar Cayce's prediction of this discovery happening around 1998 - which, obviously, they are not.
A better starting place to start is with the actual construction of the Sphinx itself. It was never a pharaoh, a fox, a lion, a donkey, it is the depiction of an
Anubis who was most often represented in ancient Egyptian society as sitting on a box, which is what the Sphinx "originally was", prior to being re-carved (researcher Robert Temple), when it was created 10,400 years +/- ago (a dating which aligns with the Orion correlation theory and Robert Schoch geological assessments). This information has been echoed many time by our ET communicators.
The statue of the jackal lying on a box-shrine apparently with a double meaning: watcher and keeper/master of mysteries set in place at the time when Virgo was transitioning into the age of Leo with Orion was due east in relation to it.
More later...
"For it is a very real possibility, indeed, that deep inside the oldest, the largest, the tallest, the most sacred monument on this planet, lies a heavily guarded secret. Inside the Great Pyramid of Giza, wrapped in some unearthly darkness and standing in hallowed stillness, could be a secret chamber or chambers, waiting, at any minute now to be opened after at least four if not many more millennia."
"This chamber could be the supreme archaeological prize, the jackpot of Egyptology that may by far surpass the discovery of Tutankhamun’s intact tomb in 1922. But wait, there is more. The Giza Plateau, it very much seems, has finally decided to disclose all its secrets at once. For not far from the Great Pyramid, in a shallow enclave to the east broods the Great Sphinx. It, too, may mulishly be guarding the ultimate treasure trove under its belly: the legendary “Hall of Records” of a civilization long lost in the mists of time."
"The location and possible entrances to such secret chambers in the Great Pyramid and under the Great Sphinx have been known since early 1993. Yet, as amazingly frustrating as it sounds, all attempts to confirm the existence of these possible secret chambers have been forcefully prevented by Zahi Hawass. Or have they really? Could clandestine attempts have been made away from the public eye and, as strange as it may be, from the eyes of the Egyptian authorities themselves? Is that at all possible? Is there a conspiracy afloat here, one that may implicate not just Hawass but other individuals and institutions?"
Robert Bauval