New research sheds fresh light on mystery of infant consciousness

5 Replies, 412 Views

New research sheds fresh light on mystery of infant consciousness

Quote:In the study, entitled ‘Consciousness in the cradle: on the emergence of infant experience’, the researchers argue that by birth the infant’s developing brain is capable of conscious experiences that can make a lasting imprint on their developing sense of self and understanding of their environment.

The team comprised neuroscientists and philosophers from Monash University, in Australia, University of Tübingen, in Germany, University of Minnesota, in the USA, and Trinity College Dublin.

Although each of us was once a baby, infant consciousness remains mysterious, because infants cannot tell us what they think or feel, explains one of the two lead authors of the paper Dr Tim Bayne, Professor of Philosophy at Monash University (Melbourne).

“Nearly everyone who has held a newborn infant has wondered what, if anything, it is like to be a baby. But of course we cannot remember our infancy, and consciousness researchers have disagreed on whether consciousness arises ‘early’ (at birth or shortly after) or ‘late’ ­– by one year of age, or even much later.”
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


[-] The following 2 users Like Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Valmar, Typoz
(2023-10-19, 02:57 AM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: New research sheds fresh light on mystery of infant consciousness

"and consciousness researchers have disagreed on whether consciousness arises ‘early’ (at birth or shortly after)"

Somewhat loaded, wouldn't you agree? Like it is taken as a given that consciousness arises rather than consciousness is present from the get-go.
I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.
Freeman Dyson
[-] The following 10 users Like Kamarling's post:
  • Raimo, Valmar, diverdown, LotusFlower, Silence, David001, Ninshub, nbtruthman, Sciborg_S_Patel, Larry
I wonder if this thread could be tidied up. I had intended to address the actual topic of infant consciousness but it seems this is no longer the place to do so.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Typoz's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel
(2023-10-22, 01:28 PM)Typoz Wrote: I wonder if this thread could be tidied up. I had intended to address the actual topic  of infant consciousness but it seems this is no longer the place to do so.

Yes, apologies. One comment leads to a response and it quickly goes off-track. Feel free to remove any of mine.
I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.
Freeman Dyson
[-] The following 1 user Likes Kamarling's post:
  • Typoz
(2023-10-22, 06:29 PM)Kamarling Wrote: Yes, apologies. One comment leads to a response and it quickly goes off-track. Feel free to remove any of mine.

No problem, I didn't feel anything should be deleted, maybe relocated.
[-] The following 2 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Kamarling, Sciborg_S_Patel
(2023-10-22, 07:18 PM)Typoz Wrote: No problem, I didn't feel anything should be deleted, maybe relocated.

Done. Relocated to Pseudoskeptism and acceptable versus unacceptable science [split from "infant consciousness"].
[-] The following 2 users Like Laird's post:
  • Typoz, Kamarling

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)