JNDS issue: quantum misuse in psychic literature

5 Replies, 690 Views

I got the latest issue of the Journal of Near Death Studies in my mailbox this week, or last. Might be of interest to some as it's devoted to the topic of "quantum misuse in psychic literature", a subject I know has been discussed in this forum or previous (family-)related ones, and there are some interesting contributors.

https://iands.org/research/publications/...nds37.html

(Kastrump? Interesting Freudian slip...)

Vol. 37 No. 3, Fall 2019
  • Editor's Foreword • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
  • Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature • Jack A. Mroczkowski, PhD, and Alexis P. Malozemoff, PhD
  • Misuse or Breakthrough?: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" • Deepak Chopra, MD
  • Not Misues but Progress: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" • Amit Goswami, PhD
  • Don't Look at My Hand: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" • Dean Radin, PhD
  • Quantum Physics as Analogy: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" • Pim van Lommel, MD
  • Reasonable Inferences From Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" • Bernardo Kastrump, PhD
  • Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature: A Rejoinder •  Asexis P. Malozemoff, PhD, and Jack A. Mroczkowski, PhD
  • Editor's Afterword • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
[-] The following 3 users Like Ninshub's post:
  • tim, Typoz, OmniVersalNexus
I've had several conversations with Janice Holden and I'm inclined to listen to whatever she has to say. She's a very wise and kind woman.
(This post was last modified: 2020-06-28, 11:10 PM by OmniVersalNexus.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes OmniVersalNexus's post:
  • Ninshub
This post has been deleted.
I haven't read it yet. The abstract says they present examples and explanations of misuse. Headings include "Wavefunction and Quantization", "Observation and Quantum Collapse", "Entanglement and Quantum Nonlocality", "Microscopic or Macroscopic?", then they go into examples of "quantum misuse" in Van Lommel (2010), Chopra (1993), Dispenza (2014), Goswami (1993) and Schwartz (2017). In a two paragraph section that note exceptions to misuse, they mention Dean Radin (1997) and Ed Kelly (2007).

If you're interested in it Max, I'll try to scan it and message you about it so you can get it as soon as I get the time (maybe PM me your email), and maybe then if you feel like it you can read it and post your thoughts about it.

I'll try to do it later tonight.
[-] The following 2 users Like Ninshub's post:
  • Typoz, OmniVersalNexus
This post has been deleted.
This post has been deleted.

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)