(2020-01-28, 12:52 AM)Will Wrote: Thanks.
I've felt for a while that the biggest weakness of the Psi Encyclopedia as it's currently set up is the unwillingness by some of its article writers to be frank over unpleasant facts, whether that's Uri Geller's controversial reputation and fraud allegations or, more seriously, Richet's views on race. As it reads now, his article makes as little of that as possible, with as few details as possible.
Yes - I agree the coverage isn't always critical enough. It certainly needs to be critical about scientific matters, and for balance to be critical about other matters as well.