I think almost by definition extreme, dogmatic sceptics aren't very bright.
"This isn't controversial" really isn't a clever claim to make, because it can be disproved by just one person disagreeing with it.
And his choice of killer argument against precognition isn't very clever either, given that he evidently knows nothing about either gambling or speculating on the stock market!
"This isn't controversial" really isn't a clever claim to make, because it can be disproved by just one person disagreeing with it.
And his choice of killer argument against precognition isn't very clever either, given that he evidently knows nothing about either gambling or speculating on the stock market!