|
|
|
Type S and M errors as a “rhetorical tool”
| Source | http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2025/09/type-s-and-m-errors-as-rhetorical-tool.html |
| Author | Daniel Lakens |
| Published | 2025-09-28, 05:19 AM |
| Summary | Update 30/09/2025: I have added a reply by Andrew Gelman below my original blog post. We recently posted a preprint criticizing the idea of Type S and M errors (https://osf.io/2phzb_v1). From our abstract: “While these concepts have been proposed to be useful both when designing a study (prospective) and when evaluating results (retroactive), we argue that these statistics do not facilitate the proper design of studies, nor the meaningful interpretation of results.” In a recent blog post that is |
| Discovered via | The 20% Statistician |
| Categories |
|
Discussion
Please log in to start a discussion of this resource.
|
Mastodon