2020-08-19, 12:51 PM
(2020-08-19, 11:56 AM)tim Wrote: [ -> ]The last two lines, though I absolutely agree with
Excellent. Regardless of our other differences, this is an important agreement.
(2020-08-19, 11:56 AM)tim Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway, you can have the last word
Thanks. Because this is an issue that I feel very (most) strongly about (and despite my concern that doing so might lead to hostilities), I take you up on that offer. I will try to be brief, and avoid unpleasantness. [This is a majorly revised version of my original post, which was quite wordy].
In brief: I encourage you to consider the possibility that your fundamental objections to veganism/fruitarianism are unreasonable, because, as I see them, the one is a non sequitur (as I pointed out in post #90 to this thread), and the other is a straw man (that the core principle of veganism is to eliminate ALL suffering, including that in the natural world).
Maybe I'm right?
Finally, regarding the idea that veganism is "extreme", I think "uncompromising" is a better fit. Just as we would not compromise on our view of assaults upon and killings of humans - they are unconditionally wrong - vegans take the same view with respect to the animals we exploit in our farming, entertainment, and research sectors. In any case, if it is an extremism, it is a peaceful extremism, and why would anybody object to the idea of an "extremely" peaceful world?