People that sit on the both side what do you think about the propnet and skeptic?

100 Replies, 7942 Views

(2019-06-26, 01:43 PM)Max_B Wrote: Lol...

I think laughing is the only possible thing to do when confronted by such absurd bias.

http://skepdic.com/shynesseffect.html

 (Randi's malicious and delicious sense of humor is nowhere better demonstrated than in his dealings with Taylor and Phillips. In Project Alpha, he trained the tricksters and then offered the scientist his assistance in detecting trickery by them. With Taylor, he met him disguised as a reporter and opened and closed his "sealed" tubes in front of him without the scientist even noticing. He even scratched "bent by Randi" on one of the tubes.)

and

"The final blow to Taylor's shyness effect occurred when an alternative team of scientists decided to replicate Taylor's findings. Six of his metal-bending prodigies were tested in a room with one observer, who noticed no cheating even though "psychokinetic" metal-bending occurred repeatedly. But a hidden camera recorded the truth about the shyness effect, as reported by the investigators in the September 4, 1975, issue of the scientific journal Nature: "A put the rod under her foot and tried to bend it; B, E, and F used two hands to bend the spoon . . . while D tried to hide his hands under a table to bend the spoon." Today, Taylor has retracted many of his 1975 claims."

Big Grin Big Grin
[-] The following 1 user Likes Raf999's post:
  • Steve001
This post has been deleted.
(2019-06-27, 04:21 PM)Max_B Wrote: It's called work hardening and is well understood.

exactly, this is what I was talking about. It is a well known magician trick.

i think pararesearches should also follow magician course, all their PhDs don't help much if they get fooled by simple stuff.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Raf999's post:
  • Max_B
This post has been deleted.
(2019-06-27, 06:05 PM)Max_B Wrote: I love this tutorial for one way of producing a spoon bending effect... You can watch the first part of the video showing the effect, and you just can't see anything, it's so well controlled... then you see how it's done, and the palming skills are really fantastic...


Considering that Taylor was tricked by kids and their "shyness effect", I believe any magician can trick people that want to believe spoon bending is real.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Raf999's post:
  • Max_B
(2019-06-27, 07:11 PM)Raf999 Wrote: Considering that Taylor was tricked by kids and their "shyness effect", I believe any magician can trick people that want to believe spoon bending is real.

Let me see if I got this. So all it takes to bend a spoon is deception, not some special mind powers?
[-] The following 1 user Likes Steve001's post:
  • Raf999
(2019-06-27, 09:15 PM)Steve001 Wrote: Let me see if I got this. So all it takes to bend a spoon is deception, not some special mind powers?

As far as I am concerned, yes. Like all superpowers, if nobody in a hundred years managed to show they are real in controlled conditions then they are non existent.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Raf999's post:
  • Steve001
I happen to agree with Chris that it was better to make a new thread rather than keep pulling this one off-topic. Since I want an answer from one individual, however:

(2019-06-27, 06:05 PM)Max_B Wrote: I love this tutorial for one way of producing a spoon bending effect... You can watch the first part of the video showing the effect, and you just can't see anything, it's so well controlled... then you see how it's done, and the palming skills are really fantastic...


I'm rather skeptical of macro-PK in general, and Radin's spoon in particular. However, if one takes Radin's account at face value, I can't say that any of the videos you provided explain what he described. He bent it himself, ruling out this particular video; the explanation you're arguing for isn't the one Shermer offered; and none of these videos clearly explain how the spoon could have been unyielding for several minutes before Radin managed to bend it. That is the point I'd want addressed, at least concerning the objections to a psi explanation. (I'd also want it addressed why Radin, being allowed to keep the spoon, didn't hand it over to someone for analysis, but as he's not here to answer, I'm stuck on that one.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes Will's post:
  • Laird
This post has been deleted.
I'm on the same boat as Max, there so many ways into which the trick can be done that fraud remains in my opinion the first answer toi what has been observed.

After all, events such as this one need to have a solid basis to be declared real. This really are extraordinary claims.

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)