I have been having a private discussion about evaluating research, and the extent to which knowledge and experience influences this. I tend to go on and on about how I evaluate research, but it occurs to me that I should be asking others how they do so (before letting my own prejudices run amok 
). To that end, I would be interested in what any of you think of this paper by Radin on intentional tea and mood, and how you go about evaluating it:
http://deanradin.com/evidence/Shiah2013.pdf
As a randomized, controlled, double-blind therapeutic trial, it should be a fairly straightforward paper to evaluate.
Linda
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-28, 05:13 PM by fls.)
). To that end, I would be interested in what any of you think of this paper by Radin on intentional tea and mood, and how you go about evaluating it:http://deanradin.com/evidence/Shiah2013.pdf
As a randomized, controlled, double-blind therapeutic trial, it should be a fairly straightforward paper to evaluate.
Linda
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
