In defence of free will: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
→‎Refuting the argument from incompatibility with a mutually exclusive dichotomy: Clarified the wording introduced by the previous edit.
Line 25: Line 25:
We might make the following analogy:
We might make the following analogy:


* Necessitated effect <=> Necessarily true proposition.
* Necessitating cause <=> Necessarily true proposition.
* Contingent effect <=> Contingently true proposition.
* Contingent cause <=> Contingently true proposition.
* Causeless (random) occurrence <=> False proposition.
* Lack of cause (randomness) <=> False proposition.


=== Why accept contingent causality? ===
=== Why accept contingent causality? ===
Retrieved from ‘https://psiencequest.net/wiki/In_defence_of_free_will’