Psience Quest

I like the idea of having some or most of the code server-side. While it may appear less transparent, it might be considered less open to manipulation. Perhaps?

(2018-10-16, 02:11 PM)Typoz Wrote: [ -> ]I like the idea of having some or most of the code server-side. While it may appear less transparent, it might be considered less open to manipulation. Perhaps?

I suppose that either way you invite skepticism: client-side, and somebody can easily fake their results. Server-side, there will be speculation as to an issue with the site. As this isn't under fully controlled conditions I would say the random selection of the correct color should be done client-side, and the results stored on the server.

(2018-10-16, 02:06 PM)Oliver Wrote: [ -> ]Ok is Psience Quest able to host an extra script? If I make a php script as an endpoint we can use to store the results, could it be hosted here? If we can host the client-side code too, then we'd have our own ESP test.

Yes, we have a fair bit of control over our hosting account, including cPanel, FTP, and shell access. PHP is a good idea too as our forum and wiki software - MyBB and MediaWiki respectively - are both PHP apps.

(2018-10-16, 02:23 PM)Oliver Wrote: [ -> ]I suppose that either way you invite skepticism: client-side, and somebody can easily fake their results. Server-side, there will be speculation as to an issue with the site. As this isn't under fully controlled conditions I would say the random selection of the correct color should be done client-side, and the results stored on the server.

You're right that either way we invite skepticism. The motivation for this app though was to eliminate the possibility of client-side cheating compared to the app from which you've already shared your very impressive results. Perhaps we could support both? We could then check whether overall (and per-user) results differ between client- and server-side. I think the priority should be on server-side though.

What do others think?

(2018-10-16, 03:37 PM)Laird Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, we have a fair bit of control over our hosting account, including cPanel, FTP, and shell access. PHP is a good idea too as our forum and wiki software - MyBB and MediaWiki respectively - are both PHP apps.


You're right that either way we invite skepticism. The motivation for this app though was to eliminate the possibility of client-side cheating compared to the app from which you've already shared your very impressive results. Perhaps we could support both? We could then check whether overall (and per-user) results differ between client- and server-side. I think the priority should be on server-side though.

What do others think?

Ok I will get started on a php app that selects colors randomly each time, and can store the results. I'll make a new thread when it's runnable.

(2018-10-16, 05:46 PM)Oliver Wrote: [ -> ]Ok I will get started on a php app that selects colors randomly each time, and can store the results. I'll make a new thread when it's runnable.

Super.

1/25 meh :<
I have no power

(2018-11-10, 08:35 AM)Vy Chấn Hải Wrote: [ -> ]1/25 meh :<
I have no power

1/25 is impressive. Some people do score below rather than above chance. But doing something consistently, over many test runs, that's more difficult.

(2018-11-10, 08:35 AM)Vy Chấn Hải Wrote: [ -> ]1/25 meh :<
I have no power

Maybe not now but if you keep training you will. It's not so much about if you have it, but if you want it.