(2017-09-18, 06:37 PM)Brian Wrote: I think Sci feels that because it contains information that can't be validated, it remains a conspiracy theory and should be discussed as such. I see his point and I tend to agree but I am very close to the border.
(2017-09-18, 06:15 PM)Stan Woolley Wrote: Sci & I disagree on a subject that I think should be in politics, but he thinks should be in CT.
Could someone have a look at it please.
If someone really feels that strongly about it, they can PM one of the admins. Although personally I don't care much since they're both hidden forums and there's bound to be crossover and some judgement calls - I can imagine many kinds of threads fitting both.
Reply
Reply
The following 1 user Likes Ninshub's post:1 user Likes Ninshub's post • Doug