Physical Mediumship Experience

48 Replies, 6268 Views

Physical mediumship, all mediumship for that matter, is nothing more than a tool or ritual to assist you in having an experiential physical life. Like any properly applied tool, it will give you what you need not what you want.

You developed a set of expectations and guess what, they, for the most part, didn't happen. What does that tell you? 

You created the physical mediumship demonstration as an exact reflection of the beliefs that you brought to it. One of those beliefs is that you could expect, or hope to expect, that the demonstration would, in part or whole, meet your expectations. That is one idea you can explore, perhaps it is that exploration that is what you need.

When you drop the expectations, you drop the impediment that those expectations bring with it. If you want to plan, plan, then drop it and trust yourself to get exactly what you need, in the form and style you need it, when you need it, not a moment sooner or later. Why else would you incarnate in this severely limiting environ if it wasn't for the process of learning and getting what you have come here to receive?
[-] The following 3 users Like Pssst's post:
  • Ninshub, Doppelgänger, jkmac
(2017-09-13, 08:55 PM)Pssst Wrote: Physical mediumship, all mediumship for that matter, is nothing more than a tool or ritual to assist you in having an experiential physical life. Like any properly applied tool, it will give you what you need not what you want.

You developed a set of expectations and guess what, they, for the most part, didn't happen. What does that tell you? 

You created the physical mediumship demonstration as an exact reflection of the beliefs that you brought to it. One of those beliefs is that you could expect, or hope to expect, that the demonstration would, in part or whole, meet your expectations. That is one idea you can explore, perhaps it is that exploration that is what you need.

When you drop the expectations, you drop the impediment that those expectations bring with it. If you want to plan, plan, then drop it and trust yourself to get exactly what you need, in the form and style you need it, when you need it, not a moment sooner or later. Why else would you incarnate in this severely limiting environ if it wasn't for the process of learning and getting what you have come here to receive?
Oh come on. That is such a cliche, BS answer. 

You sound like my good friend who is a born again christian. He told me that to experience God I need to believe in God. The problem is: that is circular logic. If, to believe in God you need to experience him(it?) then you have an unsolvable conundrum. You can't force yourself to believe in anything. You either do or you don't and for some (like me) it is based on evidence. 

I didn't "expect" anything going into the event. I hoped to have an experience that demonstrated to me whether all of this is real. 

Now you might say: well, apparently you expected nothing to happen and that's what DID happen. How can I argue that point? I can't say (nor control) what is in my subconscious somewhere. 

Now I saw the same things in that seance that others saw, and they were convinced. I would guess that in some way, they probably wanted to be convinced. However, I would tell you further, that they simply have a low threshold for belief. And if that's what's required to "believe" then count me out. I refuse to dumb myself down, to shut off my natural discernment for any reason. Certainly not if it is a part of a process of self delusion.

The medium even told me, as we sat and chatted before the seance, that this thing should be unambiguous and evidential and not require faith at all. And that's the way I went into it. 

In the end- saying that the reason nothing happened proves that I went into it expecting same, just feels like a pat response from you, and a self affirming contention.

It's just like saying to a kid who failed their Math exam: "you apparently didn't want to (or believe you could) pass your exam. You got exactly what you expected". 

That would be a glib, and smug thing to say to someone, and is exactly how you appear saying it.
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-13, 09:51 PM by jkmac.)
[-] The following 3 users Like jkmac's post:
  • Silence, berkelon, Obiwan
Yeah it's all your fault jkmac. Sheesh.
[-] The following 2 users Like Obiwan's post:
  • Silence, jkmac
(2017-09-13, 09:30 PM)jkmac Wrote: Oh come on. That is such a cliche, BS answer. 

You sound like my good friend who is a born again christian. He told me that to experience God I need to believe in God. The problem is: that is circular logic. If, to believe in God you need to experience him(it?) then you have an unsolvable conundrum. You can't force yourself to believe in anything. You either do or you don't and for some (like me) it is based on evidence. 

I didn't "expect" anything going into the event. I hoped to have an experience that demonstrated to me whether all of this is real. 

Now you might say: well, apparently you expected nothing to happen and that's what DID happen. How can argue that point? I can't say (nor control) what is in my subconscious somewhere. 

Now I saw the same things in that seance that others saw, and they were convinced. I would guess that in some way, they probably wanted to be convinced. However, I would tell you further, that they simply have a low threshold for belief. And if that's what's required to "believe" then count me out. I refuse to dumb myself down, to shut off my natural discernment for any reason. Certainly not if it is a part of a process of self delusion.

The medium even told me, as we sat and chatted before the seance, that this thing should be unambiguous and evidential and not require faith at all. And that's the way I went into it. 

In the end- saying that the reason nothing happened proves that I went into it expecting same, just feels like a pat response from you, and a self affirming contention.

It's just like saying to a kid who failed their Math exam: "you apparently didn't want to (or believe you could) pass your exam. You got exactly what you expected".

What you got from the PM experience is exactly what you needed. You succeeded. If you wish to look at your experience as a failure, then that is a learning process that is entirely valid. Not that it is true...This is why the statement that [i]"saying that the reason nothing happened proves that I went into it expecting same" is inaccurate. Something did happen, for one. Your expectations weren't met and 2) you got what you need. Both came from your ability to create your physical reality based upon the few Laws of Creation, Laws with a capital "L" as in constant, unchangeable, forever, wherever in Creation. 

Faith? None needed. If you want to have the experience of "faith" then nothing wrong with that either. You expressed one experience as "ppl dumbed down". So what? That's the experience that they desire. That's the experience that they need. It is the state of being they prefer and state of being is all that matters not the circumstances surrounding it.

Now you are left with two choices. 1) Proceed and progress within your POV or 2) Change your beliefs.[/i]
[-] The following 1 user Likes Pssst's post:
  • Ninshub
(2017-09-13, 09:33 PM)Obiwan Wrote: Yeah it's all your fault jkmac. Sheesh.

There's proof that reading with clarity is an art unacquainted with some. Sheesh. Btw, anytime you want to take me on, quote me directly and move forward through your cowardice, Obi. Ad hominems on the periphery are for children.
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-13, 10:13 PM by Pssst.)
(2017-09-13, 09:30 PM)jkmac Wrote: You sound like my good friend who is a born again christian. He told me that to experience God I need to believe in God. The problem is: that is circular logic. If, to believe in God you need to experience him(it?) then you have an unsolvable conundrum. You can't force yourself to believe in anything. You either do or you don't and for some (like me) it is based on evidence. 

Not unsolvable, I would say.

I'm not a part of any particular religion, though culturally I'm probably most familiar with Christian ideas.  However I have received direct response to prayer, even when I was not in any way committed to any form of belief - in fact I was pretty much an atheist when I got one of the strongest answers to prayer.

Is that nonsensical? Why would an atheist pray? And to whom or to what would such be addressed? These things are individual, I had no answers to any of those questions. It was simply an exploration, one might almost call it an investigative experiment, but that is too dry. This is real life in all its forms.

Initially I was deeply worried that it might mean I was obliged to conform to some religion as a result. But I needn't have been concerned.  Though I'm not an atheist, I'm on the outside as far as any tradition is concerned. Perhaps being outside of any religion is in itself a tradition?
[-] The following 4 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Ninshub, Doppelgänger, Doug, Laird
(2017-09-13, 10:19 PM)Typoz Wrote: Not unsolvable, I would say.

I'm not a part of any particular religion, though culturally I'm probably most familiar with Christian ideas.  However I have received direct response to prayer, even when I was not in any way committed to any form of belief - in fact I was pretty much an atheist when I got one of the strongest answers to prayer.

Is that nonsensical? Why would an atheist pray? And to whom or to what would such be addressed? These things are individual, I had no answers to any of those questions. It was simply an exploration, one might almost call it an investigative experiment, but that is too dry. This is real life in all its forms.

Initially I was deeply worried that it might mean I was obliged to conform to some religion as a result. But I needn't have been concerned.  Though I'm not an atheist, I'm on the outside as far as any tradition is concerned. Perhaps being outside of any religion is in itself a tradition?

Perhaps unbeknownst to you consciously, your prayer was an expression of gratitude for having all the answers, information, data available to you. It also served you to initiate the questions elicited above. It showed you that the power of gratitude does not require a God, religion, or tradition.

Pretty damn good experience if you ask me.
[-] The following 3 users Like Pssst's post:
  • Ninshub, Doppelgänger, Typoz
(2017-09-13, 10:19 PM)Typoz Wrote: Not unsolvable, I would say.

I'm not a part of any particular religion, though culturally I'm probably most familiar with Christian ideas.  However I have received direct response to prayer, even when I was not in any way committed to any form of belief - in fact I was pretty much an atheist when I got one of the strongest answers to prayer.

Is that nonsensical? Why would an atheist pray? And to whom or to what would such be addressed? These things are individual, I had no answers to any of those questions. It was simply an exploration, one might almost call it an investigative experiment, but that is too dry. This is real life in all its forms.

Initially I was deeply worried that it might mean I was obliged to conform to some religion as a result. But I needn't have been concerned.  Though I'm not an atheist, I'm on the outside as far as any tradition is concerned. Perhaps being outside of any religion is in itself a tradition?
Guess what- I followed my friend's advice and not only prayed but openly invited God into my life... 

Crickets.

Some would say it was because deep down I really didn't believe. That I was faking it...
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-14, 08:57 AM by jkmac.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes jkmac's post:
  • Typoz
(2017-09-13, 10:07 PM)Pssst Wrote: What you got from the PM experience is exactly what you needed. You succeeded. If you wish to look at your experience as a failure, then that is a learning process that is entirely valid. Not that it is true...This is why the statement that [i]"saying that the reason nothing happened proves that I went into it expecting same" is inaccurate. Something did happen, for one. Your expectations weren't met and 2) you got what you need. Both came from your ability to create your physical reality based upon the few Laws of Creation, Laws with a capital "L" as in constant, unchangeable, forever, wherever in Creation. 

Faith? None needed. If you want to have the experience of "faith" then nothing wrong with that either. You expressed one experience as "ppl dumbed down". So what? That's the experience that they desire. That's the experience that they need. It is the state of being they prefer and state of being is all that matters not the circumstances surrounding it.

Now you are left with two choices. 1) Proceed and progress within your POV or 2) Change your beliefs.[/i]
Ahh actually no, I didn't get what I needed.

What I needed was definitive proof one way or the other. I got neither.

I'm in limbo. Still.

No. Although apparently you like the sound of yourself saying those words, they are hollow and meaningless to me.
(This post was last modified: 2017-09-14, 08:26 AM by jkmac.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes jkmac's post:
  • Typoz
(2017-09-14, 01:13 AM)jkmac Wrote: Ahh actually no, I didn't get what I needed.

What I needed was definitive proof one way or the other. I got neither.

I'm in limbo. Still.

No. Although apparently you like the sound of yourself saying those words, they are hollow and meaningless.

What would you seek for if you knew all the answers?
[-] The following 1 user Likes chuck's post:
  • Ninshub

  • View a Printable Version


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)